Equality Issues In Social Policy

2537 Words11 Pages
Introduced in an attempt to improve services for people with a mental disorder, the CPA was hailed by the government as a main part of its mental health policy. The principle of the CPA is to improve the conveyance of care for people with severe mental illness. It aims to identify who these people are and what their needs are. Services and resources can then be prioritise and allocated. It was introduced in April 1991 and quickly became one of the main features in the involvement, intervention and treatment of people with a mental disorder. Mental health providers were required to work with social services to coordinate care programmes for individuals in psychiatric hospitals who were about to be discharge under section 117 of the Mental health Act 1983 and also for people who were accepted by specialist psychiatric services. The review of the CPA was also designed to integrate it with care management in mental health. The multi – agencies structure was conceived to circumvent case such as Christopher Clunis, where dissimilar professionals’ assessments lead to mis – interpretations and mis – diagnosis. The CPA develop four key points such as assessment, care plan, a key worker and a review based upon four different levels, the minimum intervention, more complex intervention, fully multi – disciplinary and the supervision review. Even created to facilitate the retributions of needs, the CPA hoists issues of equality, involving race, culture, age and gender as determining features in the provision of care services. The conception of the CPA was based upon sociological, political and economical factors. It can be established that the policy’s framework embraces Functionalism, Marxism and Constructionism perspectives. Conclusively, the practice and use of the CPA are not expelled from issues of access and outcomes. Irrevocably for the CPA to be totally efficient;
Open Document