To be able to do this there needs to be clear objectives set which must be worked towards in order to reach the desired outcome. To be able to work with outcome based practice the desired outcome must be established first, this helps the team, service users and others know what the end product should be. Throughout this process there should be regular reviews to find out how outcomes are being met and find out the impact or changes that it had had on the service user. Where positive changes have been identified the programme should continue towards the goal, if however there appears to have had a negative impact on the service users then new strategies should be discussed. It follows a person centred approach to support, always keeping the needs and wishes of the service user in mind and looking to achieve the best possible outcome.
Through this process it should provide automatic evidence for the rigor of external evaluation of the partners outlined above. “the core principles of good assessment and quality assurance ……… underpinning both effective learning and the demonstration of competence” ( p xiii Foreword Rob Wye – Chief Executive Learning and Skills Improvement Service). Effective internal verification is an on-going process. It allows good practice to be shared, and can help identify problems at an early stage. Internal Quality Assurance upholds the credibility of any assessment or qualification the organisation delivers.
The risk management plan should include the following Risk Identification: This is the first step in risk analysis. KFF needs to identify risks associated with the implementation of chosen strategy. Some of the risks are poor planning, insufficient resources, lack of management commitment. Alternatives Analysis: A risk analysis is not sound if other risks alternatives are not explored. Alternatives may include the implementation of an effective strategic plan and developing a planning system/ Contingencies Poor Planning: KFF will need to make use of any of the implementation software for effective planning.
It provides opportunities to learn from your experience and develop your working practice. It is both a tool to help you analyse specific interactions or incidents that have occurred at work, as well as a method of working in the moment that is mindful and self-aware. 1.2. Explain the importance of reflective practice in continuously improving the quality of service provided? Reflecting on your practise is important as it can help you to focus on what you have done well and identify areas you may need to improve I.e.
That is, a false premise can possibly lead to a false result, and inconclusive premises will also yield an inconclusive conclusion. Both types of reasoning are routinely employed. One difference between them is that in deductive reasoning, the evidence provided must be a set about which everything is known before the conclusion can be drawn. Since it is difficult to know everything before drawing a conclusion, deductive reasoning has little use in the real world. This is where inductive reasoning steps in.
The process evaluation is a good tool to use to provide improvement opportunities. They can be used throughout the project life to help managers make decisions and improvements for a program. When looking for program improvements opportunities, managers and funders should start at the very beginning when building or planning the program methods, which will help to identify areas in need of improvement. Program officers and funders who monitor recipients of grants will usually use a grantee’s evaluation results as tools for improvement. They can determine whether or not the internal evaluation was carried out with integrity.
L.O 1- 1.2 The key concepts and principles of assessment are to give the candidate the opportunities they are entitled to in which to prove their knowledge and competence in their subject. To do that the assessment must be: * Fair to the candidate. The decision should be made solely on whether the candidate has met the assessment criteria or not. Decisions must not be based on opinion, personal feelings or sympathy for the candidate. * Reliable.
Baldrige, along with the other delegates, strongly believed that the issue of quality should be addressed. A process/effort that ensures that processes are followed, that the processes have us doing the right things, the right way, and when they fail to be used or fail to perform as expected we have a way to correct, adjust, or escalate the matter until it is resolved to everyone's satisfaction. Some ways are to plan to improve, design to include improvements and requirements, manufacture with improvements, review new item and improvements, test of the new item, test of previous articles. Leading global standards organizations,
When a deductive argument is invalid, it is automatically considered unsound. Inductive arguments are judged on whether they are strong or weak. If the premises of an argument are considered to be true and the conclusion is not likely to be false, it is a strong argument. If there is a possibility that the conclusion may be false but the premises are still true, then the argument is weak. When an inductive argument is weak, it is automatically considered
Explain the functions of internal quality assurance in learning and development | Quality Assurance is an important requirement within the learning process to ensure that correct standards, procedures and processes are not only effective and up to date but also to ensure that learners are progressing at an acceptable rate that is relevant to their skill level. It is the responsibility of the quality department to ensure that the integrity of the qualification is maintained by continuously updating their information regarding latest versions of standards, legislation, funding requirements and external requirements, such as Ofsted.The IQA should carry out functions that will aid the assessment process, such as Standardisation; ensuring all