How does the performance of each company compare to the S&P 500? FedEx had the largest foreign presence in China, which included 11 weekly flights, twice as much as UPS. The performance of FedEx and UPS compared to the S&P 500 was drastic. Both companies exceeded the S&P between the period of October of 2003 and December of 2003, FedEx slightly above UPS. After December of 2003, both companies fell below S&P, and then increasing as the months continued on.
This combined with the current fuel climate and oil prices result in a lot of demand for bio-fuels which is why 20% of American grown corn goes on bio-fuels. Like a rise in income this also shifts the demand curve to the right and results in demand pull inflation. This can be illustrated by the same diagram and the same shift from P1 to P2. In conclusion the prices of grains such as corn and wheat have risen as a result of multiple demand side factors. In 2007 was when the rise in disposable incomes in China and the rise in demand for bio-fuels saw significant rises which in combination caused a large price rise as a result of demand pull inflation.
I have leaned that if your population is to high your people will feel crowded and there will be a food shortage but more people equals more taxes. So I had to figure out a way to balance the rising population but also Battle over population. The answer was (this is the shocker…) industrialization of farmlands. ( Again does this sound familiar?). Its no surprise that China is one of the most Industrialistic country with over 1, 330, 044, 544 people ( as of July 2008 Source: www.google.com ) which in my scientific analysis says nearly 700, 000, 000 are in the work force and within nearly 100, 000, 000 or less (much, much less) are in agriculture or livestock.
Those who are critical of Reagan’s policy speak of the explosion of the United States’ budget deficit during the 1980s. The deficit was $101b in 1981 and had risen to $236b by 1983. The national debt was significantly increased during this time period as well. Rising from $1,004b to $2,028b from 1981 to 5 1989, the massive debt ensured future generations would incur substantial repayment costs (Niskanen & Moore 1996). of Reagan’s tenure, the budget deficit was $141b.
This coupled with an increase in living for the majority of the world, especially RICs such as India where its oil consumption had increased by 40 million tonnes over a 6 year period, makes supplying the world’s energy demands a very difficult task. The main source of energy for the majority of the world comes from fossil fuels; however this reliance is a large cause for concern as these are finite and cause great environmental damage. It is believed that we have reached peak oil production, meaning that we are producing more than we ever have or ever will in the future. It is thought that at current levels of consumption we only have 40 years of oil supplies remaining. Resulting in increasing prices and increased reliance on unstable oil rich nations that can limit supply so as to earn
With growing competition among private companies, there was a significant growth in the number of factories in China. This also led to toxic-coal-waste, which is the “largest source of industrial waste” in China (Doc. 7). Because of China’s increasing energy demand due to a rising production in cars and air conditioners, it “is turning into the world’s biggest energy consumer” (Doc. 6).
The Influence of China’s demand for Australia’s resources on our Economy Globalisation has been occurring rapidly in the recent decades throughout the world which has resulted in the free movement of people, the advancement in technology and an increase in global trade. This has allowed countries around the world to integrate and influence foreign economies more dramatically. Trading can even go back to the times of World War 2 to the times of 2000 when Australia’s globalisation was increasing trade with Asia like China. China is a small country who has a population over just over 1.3 Billion, there economic growth rate stands at 9.6% [1] and as a result they have a reasonably high inflation rate of 6.2%. [2] The influence of China’s
China is a bustling nation, but could it be the next world superpower? For one it certainly has potential, with the army, manpower, technology, and money they sure could rise to the top at any rate. Not only does china have all of this, but America still owes them money and they also make everything for America, they could cut off this supply line if they needed to which could lead to problems for the great young nation. China could undeniably be a world superpower in the near future or further. Like stated China has the man power to do just about anything quickly even working on extremely large projects could be a breeze for china.
12. It’s becoming hard to assign companies to one’s home country due to globalization. Most companies these days are world wide, with a possibility of having multiple hearths. This serves as a challenge because roughly 1/3 of global trade is within the multinational companies. For example, China generates more than 21% of U.S. economic output and employs 3/5s of all manufacture’s employees (about 1 million).
In year 2006, the U.S. and along with other countries like France, Germany and the United Kingdom that first industrialised were faced with a significant drop of GDP. The U.S. dropped from 40.3 percent to 19.7 percent, however still remained the largest in the world. This was due to the faster economic growth of several other economies in Asia. (Jones, 2010) China would be the best example to describe the situation. Basically, China today, increased to a marginal amount of 15.1% from the 1960s.