It is also a word that means to represent yourself/ the way you represent yourself, baggy clothes, shitty hats, small penis and basically a way to say your afraid to come out of the closet.The most used word in the whole fucking universe. Douche bags use it, your kids use it, your mail man uses it, and your fucking dog uses it. If you got swag, you generally wear
Donnie Darko shows how the monstrous can be represented or misrepresented depending on the interpretation by the viewer. This is a film filled with elements of science fiction, horror and drama but does not come under one genre. Its appeal is in its eccentric way of telling a story, and its ambiguities of both the characters and the exploration of determinism and free will, sanity and insanity, loneliness and love. However it also rejects most common conventions having the main monstrous figure -Frank the bunny- also the one responsible to get Donnie (the protagonist) ready before the world ends, thus saving the original world by causing the destruction of the tangent world. It uses the story to convey its meaning primarily through dialogue and meticulous editing and leaves the majority of the interpretation of the film up to the viewer’s imagination.
Because we are poor, shall we be vicious?’, illustrating clearly her belief that murder or violence is not the correct or dignified way of conducting oneself. This realisation by at least some of the characters that violence is not the only way of achieving goals is pivotal to understanding whether or not the White Devil is indeed nothing more than a demonstration of imaginative ways to commit murder, as Cornelia’s sarcastic exclamation heavily implies that other characters do act without a need for violence, therefore exemplifying that The White Devil is more than just a vehicle for violence. However, even though this non-violent existence is present is the play, it can be claimed that the sheer volume of murders is paramount to a piece that is obsessed with imaginative murders. The simple fact that seven murders occur throughout the play is an obvious suggestion that Webster did in fact write the play as a means to demonstrate his murderously imaginative mind. On the other hand, this argument falls apart when you more closely examine both the question and The White Devil.
Comparison of Texts Draft Statement: ‘Monsters are not born into the world, they are created in it’. The significance of surroundings is portrayed through the use of imagery; it is affected by their attitudes formed by their own idiosyncratic epochs such as sublimity and postmodernism. Disparity in emotional control and behavior distinguishes a monster from a human. Both the novel “Frankenstein” by Mary Shelley and film “Blade Runner” by Ridley Scott, contrasts this idea of nature verses nurture and detachment. The creature’s emotions have power over them and they become slaves to it because they are inexperienced.
John Gardner’s novel Grendel gives a new perspective to the good versus evil plot. It paints a completely different picture of Grendel compared to the epic poem Beowulf. In Beowulf, Grendel is portrayed as a large animalistic monster that is only driven by his beastly instincts with no human character. This automatically makes the reader lean towards Beowulf and the humans as being the hero doing “good” and Grendel as the monster or the “evil” character, which is not entirely true. Thus, with John Gardner’s novel, you have a different perspective of the story from the “monster’s” point of view and have a better understanding of who Grendel really is and not just what the humans think of him.
Alex does not believe that the Waknuk religion is right about mutants being sinful and thinks that David’s telepathy is a new character of mind instead of a deviation. However, Joseph Strorm dislikes anything that is different from what he thinks is normal and has destroys anything that may be slightly
They ask for the truth. They believe that the animal’s lives are lies. They do not value the story that Pi tells them because it is incredible. So, Pi tells them “a story without animals” (Martel 334). Truly, it is a horrible story with gore and cannibalism but very similar to the story with animals.
The creature is not described as a beast. The phrase “and ate of it” shows that the creature does not devour the heart like a true monster, but has human feelings. Crane uses imagery in a very profound way, creating a very vivid picture in one’s head. The theme of can be inferred to be about human nature. The creature eating his heart, and realizing it was bitter implies that humans are capable of defining their own self, and appreciate themselves even though their personality may be ugly.
In this essay, I will try to explore Victor Frankenstein’s characterization, in terms of his humanity considering his experiences, and his narration. My aim in trying to explore Frankenstein’s characterization is to show that although the appearance of the creature was resembled a monster; it could not be defined as monster. It cannot be denied that the creature behaved mercilessly and he was accused of murdering even though he was good hearted. However, the creature could not present his feelings and thoughts to anyone as his appearance was monstrous. So, Victor Frankenstein was guilty as he created the creature, and left him alone.
What can also be seen is a role reversal where it is the animals that are the master which humans aspire to be, and the Yahoos submissive with their beastly and inhuman qualities. Also present within Gulliver's Travels is the satire of humans portrayed in a negative light, inviting the reader to realise their own vices present in their own society. This invitation of the reader also leads to the different types of readings one may gather from the Fourth Part of Gulliver’s Travels. It is either a 'Hard' or 'Soft' reading, theories suggested by Neil Chudgar. These five points are able to confirm Swift's misanthropic approach to the representation of humans and the virtuous approach to the representation of the Houyhnhnms.