Not be able to get money to go on outings, clubs making them feel left out. Likely to be bullied, due to kids spotting differences. Family environment and background can affect such as alcohol, drugs cigarettes by family impacting on child. When the parents smoke and cause unhealthy atmosphere and if doing during pregnancy cause lung problems. Alcohol and drugs causing rows which distracts the child and gives negative influence.
If the parents cannot control what there kids watch then don’t let them watch television when they are not there. The only merit I can think of is that if you watch something violent then it scares the hell out of you and you really don’t want to do what scared the hell out of you. Formulate a
There were a lot of emotions used, like for example “Self-confessed television addict often feel they ought to do other things, but the fact that they don’t read and plant their garden or sew or crochet or play games or have conversations means that those activities are no longer as desirable as television viewing”, (Winn) In my opinion she is saying that television addicts no longer have the passion for anything anymore, television takes away from the small things that are fun to do. Another example of pathos, “And yet television does not satisfy, else why would the viewer continue to watch hour after hour, day after day”. To me she is saying that television doesn’t really satisfy the addict’s needs that is why they continue to watch. Marie also uses logos in one of her paragraphs by saying “They are living in a holding pattern, as it were, passing up the activities that lead to growth or development or a sense of accomplishment”. By this statement, I feel Marie is saying that by watching TV this will make addicts procrastinate on getting things that they need to get done finished and that they can’t learn anything and grow from experiences in life if they are glued to the
She believed “a pattern of repeated actions. Clusters of schemas developed into later concepts” Media reports have an influence on the way children play because news reports that are on the television and in newspapers will make parents not want to let their children leave the house because of what may be happening in surrounding areas. Technology will also restrict children from playing, this could be because of game consoles or television programmes. This is because children are more interested in playing on the latest games and watching their favourite television programmes this will cause obesity in children because they will not be getting the required amount of exercise
In the book, this was not so apparent as they introduce this in the first page and with not much emphasis on this point. This helps my understanding of the novel as a whole because these children make some childish mistakes, and their values differ throughout the novel, showing the amount of growth that the children have went through. The third and possibly most important thing I've learned from the film and documentary was that To Kill a Mockingbird is about the imperfections in peoples lives and that not everyone will get along in society. It also shows how people with different social and economic statuses, clash with each other. From Jem and Scout's eyes it seems that everyone should get along but as the Tom Robinson case goes underway, they soon realize that things don't always seem the way they
That however has been proven untrue. Some parents are simply looking for reasons to medicate their children so that they do not have to parent them. This is when it becomes increasingly important to make sure that they child in question fits the criteria for what is needed for an AD/HD diagnosis. Contrary to what many believe poor parenting is not a cause of AD/HD. In addition to that playing video games, too much sugar, fast past lifestyle and lack of self control are also invalid causes of AD/HD.
“Most adults, has some concerns for their children watching those shows. They had a thought that they might influence their kids to do some bad things in life because of the violence in the shows”(Feinstein 2). But that was not the only thing that they might have thought would influence their kids, “comedians were now on television too, and it was big for them because they could say stuff they could not say on the radio” (Adam 2). That did not top their daughters and sons from watching television; it is not like they could watch it all the time. Plus, there were only a few
Diet of television is the answer. I think parents should not replace a baby sitter for the TV, or even replace them selves for the TV. I know a lot of parents who prefer to sleep 30 minutes alone, and all they do is send their children to watch TV or play violent video games, they totally forget about the damage it is causing to them, and when they grow up parents complaint why their children are so violent with them and everybody else. I think the idea of built-in time-channel lock circuitry is awesome. Imagine a kid solving a puzzle -which will help to develop his brain- instead of watching TV; also this kind of activities will keep him safe from violence.
Most people thinks that it makes no sense that you, at 18, have the adult mind to join the armed forces, but you are not old enough to have a drink before you go off to war. This could be considered an idiotic reason and this reason is not good enough. You may hear that it will loosen you up and help you relax. What you may not hear is that it can damage the part of your brain that controls coordination, memory, judgment and decision-making. Drinking makes you dumber!
Final Product #2 By banning books, it creates a negative effect on kids and adults and possibly even eliminate the teachings of life lessons for students. Going through life without the knowledge of what else is out there besides “good” in people can be harsh for some people especially for kids. Kids would not be able to handle life too well in the real world, if the whole time when they were younger they were being protected from all the "bad things" and “bad people.” Many people decide to do what they think is best for the safety of children, but in reality when kids grow up to be adults sometimes it harms them in more ways than helping them. Books shouldn't be banned from society, but some books do have suggestive content or profanity. When the so-called “negative parts” of the books remain, kids gain knowledge of what is and what is not good to do, say, or act.