Analytic Response to “Does Watching Sex on Television Influence Teens' Sexual Activity?” Rebecca L. Collins wrote an article titled “Does Watching Sex on Television Influence Teens’ Sexual Activity?” in the book “Pediatrics.” In this article, she examined two recent studies to let us know how watching sex on television affects teens’ sexual activity. The main argument of the article is, “Does television influence teens’ sexual activity or not?” Collins’ argument shows that watching sexual television influences teens’ sexual activity, and this influence can lead to both bad and good consequences. She also gave suggestions on how we could reduce teens’ problems when it comes to the relationship between watching sex on television and teens’ sexual activity. Collins’ claim is that “expose[r] to television sex may hasten the initiation of sexual activity among teens”; this is an example of a way the influence is bad (543). On the other hand, television can “inform teens about risks and foster communication with parents”, which is a good influence on teens (544).
This group may be particularly at risk because the cognitive skills that allow them to critically analyze messages from the media and to make decisions based on possible future outcomes are not fully developed (Gruber & Grube, 2000). According to the text analyses of broadcast media content indicate that, on average, teenaged viewers see 143 incidents of sexual behavior on network television at prime time each week, with portrayals of three to four times as many sexual activities occurring between unmarried partners as between spouses. As much as 80% of all movies shown on network or cable television stations have sexual content. An analysis of music videos indicates that 60% portray sexual feelings and impulses, and substantial minority display provocative clothing and sexually suggestive body movements. Analyses of media content also show that sexual messages on television are almost universally presented in a positive light, with little discussion of the potential risks of unprotected sexual
With just a snap on yur remote control, you can easily s and be informed about condoms. It is also before that condoms are just for adults, but now it is being appealed to teens, not just teens but also young viewer especially children of young age. Because there are lots of commercials promoting condoms, children especially teens become curious. Come to think of this, if only this commercials are being shown just for few minutes or just one or twice a day, it will lessen the possibility that children might see it. Because
The only sources of media available were television, not including reality television except for cops and the other source was radio, the internet was not as popular as it is now, in the early ninety’s. Sex was not something that was exposed or glorified when I was a child, it was something more sacred and discussed amongst your families in confidence. I was taught that sex was confidential and personal between oneself and a loved one after marriage with the agreement to start a family. The main difference between the media exploiting sex from the times of now and when I
The matter in question here is, whether distributing condoms in public high schools actually influences teenagers to participate in sexual activity. Rush Limbaugh’s opinion in his article “Condoms, the New Diploma” is that giving condoms to teenagers will encourage them to have sexual relations, and what should really be done is stimulate them to practice abstinence. Limbaugh also discusses that the motivation behind the mass distribution of condoms is ridiculous and misguided (515). His proposal is to focus on supporting abstinence but to supply protection for those that choose to repudiate. Limbaugh expresses his concern about how AIDS are a problem that came as a consequence of the sixties and seventies- the age of “free love and rampant one-night stands” (516), and about the welfare modifications, like the use of condoms.
Why is the age of people having sex getting lower and lower? Children are exposed at young ages to pornographic images and adult situations. Cable television and movies are showing things on a regular basis that twenty years ago were not shown and were considered pornographic. Many parents are allowing the television to raise their children and this is where the children receive their information on sex. The problem is children don't realize the ramifications or dangers of early sexual involvement.
It is not uncommon to see vending machines in schools. However, vending machines usually dispense sodas, chips, ice cream another snacks. So that's a good idea because kids are sexually active by the time the get to high school some people said, while others I don't agree with it. They will kind of say is like promoting sex, or a way of advertising sex to kids in school .it a good idea because many teenagers gets sexual transmitted diseases among they self or get pregnant. Many young people engage in sexual risk behaviors that can result in unintended health outcomes.
How adolescents’ perceived media influence on peers affects smoking decisions. Sourced from EBSCOhost and found in the PsycINFO database, this journal article, written for academics in 2011, remains objective in its findings and all data is verified by The Journal of Consumer Affairs. Effect of viewing smoking in movies on adolescent smoking initiation: A cohort study. Broader context of the articles arguments. * The broader context of this article is to ascertain whether or not viewing smoking in movies promotes the initiation of smoking in adolescence through initial studies conducted with over 2500 participants aged between 10 and 12 years old followed by additional studies 13 to 26 months later.
In the essay, Anna says, “[G]irls had sex with boys not because nothings seemed to matter except right now, not pregnancy, not parental disapprobation, nothing but those minutes, this dance that face, those words. Most of them knew that pregnancy could be the result, but they assured themselves that they would be the lucky ones who would not get caught” (pg. 276). I feel like in this statement, she is supplying the reader with my mind frame of a teenage girl, and lets us get into the story more by empathizing for the teens. It also shows how many teenagers are gambling with a lot on the table just for 5 minutes of fun.
At the early stages in their young lives where reading is not really their strong point, the visual stimulation of pretty colors, shapes, and exciting sounds of educational TV shines the brightest. Shows like Dora The Explorer, Word Girl, Reading Rainbow, and Mr. Rodgers Neighborhood are sometimes the strongest factors in developing their cognitive and language skills. Most of the kids watching these shows don’t even know that they are learning, and that’s the beauty of it all. Mr. Steven Johnson’s Theory of the Sleeper Curve is an arguable idea. Seeing how most of the television I watch is for entertainment purposes 80% of the time.