Source 3 shows a clear disagreement though, as it states Callaghan “struggled to rule effectively until a vote of no-confidence” was called upon. Throughout his government, Callaghan biggest concern was to maintain economic stability but in doing so had destroyed Britain’s industry. As a result of this Callaghan will forever be associated with the Winter of Discontent incident which is exactly what source 3 is suggesting. James, Callaghan is a man of experience is partially why he suited the role of Prime Minister. Source 2 states “The political skills he had perfected in his previous posts were just what was needed” which supports the view that indeed, James Callaghan was a man of experience.
Although there failure of completely vanquishing the warlords there can be little doubt that Chiang was fairly successful in solving this domestic problem and the effects it would have on the country as it is probably that without him stabilising the political and social unrest civil war would have broken out in the country much early than it did. The GMD was able to successfully implement new and improved transport links throughout the country. The three thousand mile railway track connected North and South which helped Chiang to begin re-unifying the country and the people. However there can be little doubt that the transport was created for sole purpose of the urban rich who were the majority of his supporters and it only aided them to become
Gandhi’s four principles of non-violent protest caused complex problems for the British rule, based around the fact that the Raj was built upon Indian support if that was removed there would be no more Raj. These four principles were Satyagraha, Ahimsa, Swadesh and Swaraj. Satyagraha has the literal meaning of truth-force or soul-force. Gandhi describes Satyagraha as ‘not predominantly civil disobedience but a quiet and irresistible pursuit of truth’. Satyagraha requires each campaigner to commit themselves completely for the cause.
Ultimately, because Gandhi’s beliefs and tactics in incorporating those beliefs were based on religion and peaceful, non-violent protests, and Marx believed that violence and action would successfully end social classes in Europe, there is a very distinct difference between both men’s methods, yet they shared the same common goal: to do away with inequality. If Gandhi had to respond to Marx on his methods in transforming class based societies to classless societies, I do not think that he would agree on every one of Marx’s techniques. There are many different aspects of why. They were two totally different types of activists trying to achieve the same ultimate goal. Gandhi was a man that would “strain every nerve to make Truth and Non-violence accepted in all our national activities” (i.e.
However all three sources do credit Gandhi with some aspects of his leadership style, namely his ability to inspire and mobilise the masses, and how this contributed to eventual achievement of independence. It seems independence would have been difficult to achieve without Gandhi but at the same time, had Gandhi handled certain situations differently, it might have been achieved much earlier than it did. Source 16 touches on the fact that Gandhi called off his non-cooperation campaigns in 1922, “amid mounting violence”. It implies that this slowed down the progress towards eventual independence. This was true to a certain extent; Gandhi’s non-cooperation campaigns had been relatively successful up until this point, he had called an end to the campaigns when they were at their height.
Gandhi used civil disobedience which consisted of the refusal to fight back with any physical violence, for unjust laws. The world was continuously shocked by his great accomplishments using methods such as fasting and non-violence. Due to Gandhi's non-violence and his use of civil disobedience, he was the most influential person that led to the gaining of Indian Independence. Gandhi's life consisted of many important people and countless activities that led to his major success. Mohandas Gandhi otherwise known as Mahatma Gandhi had a wife and four sons that were very important to his accomplishments.
At the beginning of this passage, King appeals to ethos by addressing their counterargument stipulating that their direct nonviolent protests were “‘unwise and untimely’” (166) using a neutral tone. King not only civilly approaches the counterargument when he states,” One of the basic points in your statement is that the action that I and my associates have taken in Birmingham is untimely…The only answer that I can give to this query is that the new Birmingham administration must be prodded about as much as the outgoing one, before it will act” (166). King utilizes a neutral tone, without any usages of loaded words or strong emotions, to present himself as a level-headed, reasonable character and an educated equal to his audience. King reasonably responds to his opponent’s main point with a rational explanation indicating that their resolve to protest is merely an action to stimulate an administration inclined to maintain the status quo unless a call for change is demanded by the populace. In the effort to persuade his
Gandhi was a wise man,that gave his time and his life for his country,India. Gandhi built up his philosopphy on a clear bases of "non violence". Gandhi wanted the Indepandence of India.One thing to notice,is his sudden rise as a "leader"-althought he didn't like to be treated as one,and estimated itself as a normal person-Gandhi stard at the bottom of the ladder.He was nothing,and little by little,he creates a whole community of "followers".Nothing is really surprising in this point,many leaders usually start on their own and gain power,but the unexpected thing,is that Mohandas Gandhi followed his own philosophy which is as we know truth, Peace, Fearlessness, Love and Nonviolence.Why is it surprising? Because most leader based their social protest on some god,or people - the precise case of Malcom X- they believed in.The social protest,fight of gandhi is most remarquable in the way it was a peacefull protest.None of his followers did nothing to arm or hurt their opposants. Many protest of fight are often violent,bloody and in many case,are not effective and leads to nothing but death.
He made sure that the party was open to all. The party had leadership but only so that a discipline could be maintained. Overall, the party was transformed and had large national followers. Leadership style and features of Mahatma Gandhi Gandhi as a Charismatic leader He had the ability to encourage people to follow him in large crowds. In South Africa, he encouraged his Indian followers to defy laws that were designed to oppress them, by using non-violent civil disobedience.
In Canada, a democratic nation, we pride ourselves on having the right to Freedom of Speech. What confuses most people is the difference between banning and censoring films. The main difference is when a film is banned, it is completely off limits for anyone to view. This method is very popular in countries such as Singapore, and Malaysia. They ban films that we find totally acceptable, even children’s films will be forbidden if seen as offensive in any way.