Discuss the Role of Genetic Factors in Aggression (9+16

1018 Words5 Pages
Discuss the Role of Genetic factors in aggression (9+16) It has often been suggested that genes have an influence on human aggression. Twin and adoption studies have often been used to determine the influence an individual’s genetic makeup has over aggressive behaviour. For example, Rhee and Waldman conducted a meta-analysis of twin and adoption studies on antisocial behaviour. They found that identical twins (share 100% genes) were more similar in anti-social behaviour than fraternal twins (50% share). This supports the theory that genetics influence aggressive behaviour, even allowing for the more closely similar environment of identical twins compared with fraternal twins. In 1961, Sandberg first identified the 47 XYY karyotype. Most people have 46 chromosomes, but it is possible for men to have an extra Y chromosome, making them XYY. Court-Brown suggested that those with the XYY makeup should be hospitalised due to the likelihood of aggressive behaviour. He later retracted that statement. Theilgard examined the personality traits of a sample of XYY men, comparing them to XY men. When comparing, researchers focused on levels of aggression in the two groups, but found that the only characteristic that was shared by all XYY men, was their above-average height. Levels of aggression fluctuated, so no definitive conclusions could be drawn. This suggests that the link between the XYY karyotype is tenuous at best. Research was also conducted in this area by Jacobs, who found that the prevalence of XYY males was much more prevalent (15/1000) in the prison population, than in the normal population (1/1000). Jacobs stated that this was because criminals are aggressive by definition, which explains the higher number. However, Jacobs disregarded the fact that not all criminals are violent e.g. fraudsters. Research since (Witkin et al) has shown that XYY is not

More about Discuss the Role of Genetic Factors in Aggression (9+16

Open Document