Discuss Issues Surrounding the Classification and Diagnosis of Schizophrenia

946 Words4 Pages
The diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia can be criticised as unreliable due to the chances of misdiagnosis. This criteria appears to be straight forward but in fact can be very confusing to other psychologist that are attempting to diagnose a certain patient as it may be difficult to agree precisely how serious their schizophrenic state is, or in fact if they have it at all. The possibility of symptom overlap could arise when, for example, manic depression vs. schizophrenia has occurred. In the early 1970’s this issue became clear when a study showed that in the US 20% were diagnosed with schizophrenia in 1930s but then rose to 80% in the 1950, where as in London this remained at 20% (Cooper et al). This could be due to several factors that also allow room for debate whether this criteria is effective. On the one hand, coincidently research by Farmer et all found that there were high levels of reliability of diagnosis using the standard interviewing technique (PSE), this was a method where a normal interview takes place. Due to the time it takes, researchers often use stages 1 and 2 of the cognitive interview (report everything and mental reinstatement of original context). As stated before, the lack of definitive guidance for each psychologist to diagnose a patient on whether they are schizophrenic. But also question the ethnocentric aspect of the criteria. This definition does not allow room for different ethnicities which may to western cultures be abnormal, such as a report of a woman washing her feet with milk in hospital toilets. She was reported as having some sort of disorder and was then misdiagnosed with schizophrenia. Luckily a woman from the same ethnicity alerted the psychologists and was then released of that label as washing her feet with milk was part of her cultural regime. This is a prime example of what issues surround the diagnosis of
Open Document