Enemy tribes were often forced to live together, which resulted in civil wars over the years. These wars, however, were not the only effects that European imperialism had on Africa. Some effects were great for the Europeans and Africans, but others only benefited the mother countries at the colonists’ expense. Document 1 clearly illustrates how the mother countries benefited at the expense of the
Ethnic minorities are also more likely to undertake low-paid, low-skilled work, and the vicious circle that stems from this – inferior housing, poorer living standards, and substandard schools in deprived areas – is actually partly caused by the welfare state system, which institutionalises this discrimination. The unique problems faced by ethnic minorities must be addressed individually, and until recently social policy has failed to do this. Furthermore, the emphasis on tackling crime that has underpinned New Labour's social policy and that of the previous Conservative governments has impacted on ethnic minorities due to the often discriminatory nature of initiatives to cut crime. The ‘stop and search' programme is unfairly targeted toward black youths, to the extent that many believe being black is tantamount to a social problem (McGhee, 2005). Such flaws in British social policy have undoubtedly contributed to a growing sense of isolation amongst ethnic minority groups, and thus it could be argued that social policy is often more harmful than
While many disregard this system as cruel and unfair, in reality it helped to shape America as it is today. Without the help of this system, economies would not be as developed as they are now. Unfree labor played a very important role in shaping the economy and society of colonial American through the use of indentured servants and slavery. The system of temporary servitude in the New World was established out of practices used in New England. In short, indentured servants were mainly poor British people without jobs.
Criticisms from supervisors and peers often are met with emotional listening resistance. We hear only the negatives and do not attend to offers of help or ways to improve our performance. We are over stimulated and do not accurately receive messages that could help us grow and develop. Barrier Three: Criticizing Personal Style Rather Than Messages. We often find ourselves criticizing the way a message is presented and ignoring its content or value.
When Australia started to become its own country in the late 1800’s to early 1900’s it is said that many immigrants were treated poorly or with disrespect. It is incorrect to say that indigenous Australians and Torres Strait Islanders received an equal choice between 1788 and the early 20th Century, although there were a few sincere attempts to assist them, these attempts would be considered unfair if it were in the 21st century. Afghans, Japanese Chinese and Pacific Islanders were all treated differently and it is not fair to state whether they had a fair go or not. Many people tried to help these races but sometimes it wasn’t quite enough. European immigrants got a fair go compared to the other immigrants but it is hard to say whether the
Transgender is something that difficult to be accepted because the act is in violation of existing law. Transgender people damage faith self and giving a bad example to people about their perspectives. Although we find these groups do not interfere with other people's lives, their actions give a negative value to society. We should be aware of this growing culture and society as a cultural practice that this matter should be contained eastern may violate other religions. The second effect is Make society feel afraid of them.
Consequently they became unhappy when the British settlers arrived and wanted to claim the land as Britain’s. Since they already had dominion and power over the native black Africans, and they didn’t want to share this power. Fortunately for
For this same reason the public opinion is divided with some people recognizing more negatives outweighing the positives while some suggest the opposite. Many people see the negative impact as being more significant because British rule in India resulted in impoverished, poor people and food shortages in India. Many people see the positive impact as being more significant because Britain brought infrastructure and technology to the Indian people. Because these viewpoints can both be supported, there is a great complexity to this issue. The position that should be taken on this issue is that British rule in India was a positive impact on the Indian people to a small extent.
DISCRIMINATION IN BOLIVIA.- The discrimination comes from centuries ago with the arrivals of people who cames from Europ. In the last years the discrimination has decreased since bolivia has an indian president called Juan Evo Morales Aima, our society has changed respecting to the discrimination. Many time before there were too much discrimination, people used to be discriminated because of the race, sex, age, ethnic groups to which they belong, diferent ages, equality gender, the social status, the color of the skin, the political thought,etc. People are discriminated because of the race but this discrimination was stronger before than now, people of color used to be seen as slaves, until nelson mandela with his fight against the discrimination could finish with the aparheid helping color people with a new start. On the other side, too many people are discriminated because of their sex or their preferences, in many cases there are people that can´t stand lesbians and gays where are seen on the streets , elderly people is also discriminated because of their age, some times the discriminations comes from the family in many cases without bad intentions.
Although in most places in the north they’re was no longer rigid racial etiquette they were aloud to mix with whites, but it remained still that they were poorer and so lived in more undesirable places with poor living conditions so they never really mixed with white Americans anyway. This shows that the Second World War never really had an effect on the lives of African Americans because they still had to deal with major segregation in the south. Although the laws may have changed the attitudes of most White people didn’t change because they were so used to their standard ways of living. However there were changes of attitudes by the government as on December 5, 1946, Truman established by executive order the President’s Committee on Civil Rights. The committee was instructed to investigate the status of civil rights in the United States and propose measures to strengthen and protect the civil rights of American citizens.