Culture is shared norms and values and ways of interacting that bind together members of society or some other collection of people together. Across cultures, the classification systems differ, e.g. in west, it is abnormal to hear voices but in some religions hearing voices can be desirable. A lot of diagnosing is to do with social norms, however these can easily change over time or space. The DSM and similar books are often made in western society so they can’t be used correctly in eastern societies making them culturally biased.
Also non-verbal types of communication can be taken the wrong way as people interpret messages wrong as they don’t have tone of voice to direct them or the fact that people often use short hand when texting which can be misunderstood. In professional places we often use acronyms that can make understanding conversations difficult. In meetings where parents and carers are present it is important not to use there acronyms as it could cause an alienation of the parents and carers who we really need to keep onside. I have attended meetings where I have felt out of
This can mean their plumbing system but also means a problem going to the toilet. Sometimes it may be appropriate to use slang with your peers but in normal working with colleagues or service users you should avoid using any language that can be misunderstood or misinterpreted or that might cause offence. Cultural differences – when the same thing means different things in two cultures, communication can be difficult. For example, it is seen as polite and respectful to make eye contact when speaking to someone in Western culture but in other cultures, for example in East Asia, it can be seen as rude and defiant. • Distress – when someone is distressed, they might find it hard to communicate.
For example, in some cultures it may be acceptable for a man to have more than one wife, while in other cultures this would be seen to be immoral, and even a crime. Different cultures express different moral codes of conduct and relative ethics allows all the different circumstances and cultures to be put into prospective when analyzing whether an action would be intrinsically good or bad. In relative ethics, it avoids judging one culture against another as it is tolerant. To a relativist, there are no universal truths, and because of this then there are no objective standards by which one culture can judge another. No one culture is better than another.
We aren’t in the dark about this. Most people just assume we are. Now a big reason people think it should be banned is because of the amount of sexism in the story. They say that girls are treated as sexual objects. But that isn’t entirely true.
Eye contact can be a sign of respect in some culture but in others it may seem rude. Another example that’s varies between cultures is touching. Some cultures see shaking hands acceptable, other see a kiss on the cheek is the polite thing to
The factors that affect communication are: -posture: Folded arms can look defensive and discourage comunication.Friends and family often mirror the others person posture during conversation witch might feel patronising or thrightening. Is thought to increase a sense of familiarity. Standing over a person seating might feel patronising or thrightening. Touch: A light touch on the person you s arm can communicate caring and understanding ,but sometimes touch can feel intrusive,even thrightening.Touch is a safe-guard issue and you must never impose yourself physically on a vulnerable
This enforces the idea that unlike Lennie, she is a complex character in the novel. Steinbeck mentioned that Curley’s wife’s voice had a “nasal, brittle quality” which is a clear sign of her flirtatious behaviour. Although her intentions were flirty, the fact that it was described as ‘nasal’ by the author made it obvious that it was unpleasant to the ears. The reaction from George made it clear to the reader that she was an attractive woman, however he was being apprehensive as he “looked away from her and then back”. This contrasts with Lennies reaction as his “eyes moved down over her body” blatantly checking her out.
Traditionally, extending federal criminal law and moral legislation reserved to states that revealed many vices of over-criminalization. The common features are excessive unchecked discretion for enforcement authorities and inevitable disparity among similarly situated people. However, other areas of society argue they are against sodomy and same sex marriages because of having traditional views that these laws preserve order in society. Nevertheless, another area certain to bring about argument is gay marriages take away from cultural values and set bad examples to the nation�s youth. Anti-gay groups oppose gay couples adopting children because of having parents of the same sex and this is more harmful than having no parents.
I believe that this is a sensitive topic for both genders and I don’t have adequate knowledge to state whether absolutely agree or disagree with the abolition of adultery law. So, considering from what I understand and believe is that if we are seeing married couples just as living creatures falling in love and cheating, I agree with the abolition of adultery law because it’s not the public business to handle. At the same time, we as humans, we can’t really control our emotions and feelings of love, and after all, what is the difference between cheating in casual couples and married couples? I mean, here is where I get confused because sometimes when we think about love, we are more towards the “animalistic” theme that sometimes sounds romantic