Most people thought that the roundheads were going to win because they had experienced leaders that had previously been in a civil war, Oliver Cromwell and Thomas Fairfax. Charles’s Cavaliers, (horse soldiers) were run by Charles himself, and partially run by Prince Rupert, an inexperienced, young man. The Lords, Landowners, Anglicans and the town of Oxford
To Subdue an Enemy Interpretation is a key concept in living a civil lifestyle and governing a civil country. Abraham Lincoln had many interpretations that were objected that directly a country fighting a civil war. These actions, though controversial were key stepping stones in restructuring a nation that had fallen apart. Lincoln, now viewed as the “Great Emancipator”, was not always viewed as so in the eyes of his fellow countrymen. Many of his decisions led to uproar, but one in the end set the ground for the United States as we know it today.
Northumberland’s religious views were unclear as he seemed to drift between beliefs in order to achieve the most power possible for himself. This asserted him as a strong politician as he was able to adapt to different situations and remain powerful. On the other hand it made him unpopular with the majority as he was seen as unstable and unreliable. During his time in power, Northumberland and the country made huge steps towards Protestantism whilst maintaining no rebellions. This tells us that he had firm control of the country, and was allowing change in the safest of manors.
The Main Reason For The Defeat Of The Royalist Cause In The First Civil War Was The Leadership Of Charles l – Assess The Validity Of This View With Reference To The Years 1642-1646. In the period up to the outbreak of civil war in England, there were several reasons as to why the Royalist Cause and Charles were defeated. Many of his subjects came to question whether he was a monarch who could be trusted to rule within the ambiguous bounds of the unwritten ancient constitution. Firstly, Charles alone contributed heavily to the defeat of the Royalist cause. He was hampered by a speech defect which made communication difficult and communication with Parliament suffered as a direct result.
During Bedford’s absence, the government of England was headed by Henry V’s other brother, Humphrey, duke of Gloucester, who was appointed Protector and Defender of the Realm. His duties were limited to keeping the peace and summoning parliament. Also Thomas Beaufort, duke of Exeter was made to protect and bring up Henry VI. These men had the most amount of influence and power during the period of Henry VI’s minority, and there is much debate on whether the minority and what come of it, had any success or not. There are many historians that argue if the minority council had influence over the causes in either the long or short term causes of the War of the Roses.
This ‘Right of Conquest’ gave rulers a legitimate claim to a throne because of their military might. As well as being a means of establishing rule, the use of force was also necessary for maintaining political control of any given territory. Many rulers spent much of their reigns travelling around their lands, giving a visible presence, enforcing royal rights and discouraging any rebellion by a show of force. This was the case for the rule of Louis VI of France, who was infamous for spending much of his life on horseback ‘enforcing royal rights ruthlessly’ and having to ‘defeat numerous petty vassals’ . Force was also
Although he had some successes, he was a very harsh ruler. So, Parliament decided to impeach Strafford based on weak accusations. For example, they said that he was heard saying to the King himself “Your Majesty, you have an army in Ireland, which you may employ here to reduce this kingdom.” However, this was supposedly said in a Privy council meeting, which surely means should be private conversation. He himself pointed out that one should be entitled to freedom of speech! Another accusation was made by a man who was nearly half deaf!
How did Cromwell help to develop a Tudor state? Thomas Cromwell, the chief minister for Henry VIII from 1533 to 1540 was a ruthless politician, who some historians believe to have caused a ‘revolution in government.’ However, other historians believe that the developments of the Tudor state were not due to Cromwell’s farsighted planning, but other factors. To answer the question, we first must identify the components of the Tudor state, and how Cromwell influenced and changed these areas. Perhaps the foremost part of the Tudor State, the Government, underwent a significant change, mostly due to the Royal Supremacy over Church carried out by Cromwell. He was familiar with Lutheran and humanist ideals, and as a lawyer he had the capabilities to carry out his ideological reforms in Parliament.
As a gifted public speaker, he used his speeches to sell people his controversial political agenda. He fought hard to make his message heard. Sam was a man for the people, and he used this to his advantage. He always made his intentions clear to his followers. At the Continental congress he forcefully voiced his political opinions in a room full of moderates (Thomas Kindig, 1995).
The levellers were radical groups active in London in the late 1646 which gained a lot of their support from the army. This group was very popular among men of “middling sort” who were unrewarded in seventeenth century English politics. The leaders of these groups were John Lilburn and Richard Overton. Their main aim was for religious toleration and to also replace the monarchy and the House of Lords with a single representative chamber elected by the male leads of the households. There manifesto was the agreement of people which favoured the ordinary citizens and wanted them to gain more rights than rich property owners.