As a result, the validity of “romantic love” is universal relies on the examination at which this declaration has been made. Secondly, cultural differences have a big influence in romantic love. Individualism culture is the one in which the person is egocentric where the only thing that truly matter is self-satisfaction. Everything people do should be related to them or be self-beneficial, and they also show less concern for others while collectivism culture is the complete opposite. People tend to be more collective, and they always see the group before they see themselves.
She was dean on about the fact that people do not live happily ever after. Graham also claimed that love could be nothing more than a biological experience, a rush of different chemicals, which make people exhibit their behavior. Being that many people believe that love is something that is totally out of their control, Graham’s belief seems to hold some truth. In “The Future of Love,” Barbara Graham discusses the union of love and marriage, and how it they fail to coexist. Graham claims that people are drawn to believe that love and marriage should naturally go together, but she didn’t consider the fact that people get together solely based on the physical aspects of things.
According to Coontz, “For most of history it was inconceivable that people would choose their mates on the basis of something as fragile and irrational as love and then focus all their sexual, intimate, and alruistic desires on the resulting marriage.” (pg. 378) Many different cultures have many different views on falling in love before marriage. Love was even looked at as incompatible with marriage. In ancient India, they thought it was disruptive to fall in love before getting married, the Greeks thought lovesickness was a sign of insanity, and in the Middle Ages if you were in love you were looked at as “deranged in the mind” by the French. In China if there was excessive love between a husband and wife it was looked upon as a threat to the solidarity of the extened family.
Lewis’s character however shifts his opinion through his experience with the patients and how they relate to the themes of the opera, Lewis gradually conceives of love something that underlies all else. “ Without love the world wouldn’t mean much”. His tone is thoughtful and wise , suggesting a grand gesture but in fact a simple truth. Through lewis journey he has come to the realisation of the importance of love and fidelity, the things he used to consider to be ‘traditional values’. “Its about important things, love and
Cultural relativism is the idea that the moral principles someone has are solely determined by the culture one lives in. These ideas seem to make sense because we as a culture understand that the judgments people make in a different culture will differ from ours whether we choose to support it or not. Our culture has different moral judgments as well and does not look at something like killing someone for stealing as morally right since our culture values human life above theft. Cultural relativism does not exist because some principles are universal and not relative only to culture. People also have the ability to think morally for themselves so morality is relative to someone’s point of view.
“Love is a force more formidable than any other. It is invisible-it cannot be seen or measured, yet it is powerful enough to transform you in a moment, and offer you more joy than any material possession could” (de Angelis). How do you begin to define a force so powerful that it can transform lives, bring you more joy than any material possession, yet has no quantitative benchmark to define it? Webster’s dictionary defines love in many ways, one being, “A strong positive emotion of regard and affection” (Webster’s). There are several different types or theories of love and there are often certain feelings that are associated with love.
Madison Butler English 10 May 12, 2013 Comparison Essay Today’s Courtship vs. Medieval Courtship Courtly love is a highly conventionalized medieval tradition of love between a knight and married noblewomen. Love in the time of chivalry was very proper and put together well. It wasn’t necessarily about love but about arranged marriages and possessions. In the times of knights there were rules when it came to “love” but as the years went on to where they are now we have begun to find love on our own and the rules and arranged marriages weren’t needed anymore.
Seeing that the one you’re “chasing” is showing little interest in you and your advances often times feeds the inferno of love burning in your soul. Lancelot faced obstacles in the sense that Guinevere was already married, to his best friend, and his King. He often went on perilous quests
Being tied together solely by their sexual desire for each other comes across as breaking this rule of courtly love. By establishing this rule, courtly love is enforcing the separation of love from sexual desire. It can be concluded that this is what causes their love, which was actually just sexual desire, as they did not separate the two concepts, to lead them to death. Another rule that applies is that “no one can love who is not driven to do so by the power of love.” In other words, the statute of love exists on its own pedestal. Only exhibiting characteristics of love, like sexual desire, cannot be used as a determination of love.
Maybe it’s just me and a few other people that view music not as a tool or commodity, but as something much more. I view music as an expression of someone’s soul and thinking. My love for music comes second to the love that I have for my mom and I would die for my mom. I love the way music powerfully conveys most of our human emotions. It’s the world’s universal language; it defies all boundaries of race, religion, creed, or sect.