Debate - Euthanasia In Sweden

882 Words4 Pages
A vibrant selection That we will all die as we know, even though many do not want to talk about it. The only question is when and how. We all take responsibility for our own lives. Do we not also take responsibility for our own death if given the opportunity? In politics, the question of euthanasia really taboo laid. There is no party who advocate active euthanasia in their program and it is not no party that takes proper position on the issue. In Sweden, only steps to achieve a dignified death to be taken when it is burdensome for the patient, this is called passive euthanasia, and means that the patient no longer receive life-sustaining treatment. In consultation with the family doctor close by all technical means, but the dose of painkillers continues, in order to shorten the patient's suffering. In Sweden, both active euthanasia that physician-assisted suicide is prohibited. Active euthanasia involves a patient, if possible, to choose between falling asleep and physician-assisted suicide is when a doctor writes out a sufficiently large dose of medicine, the patient can take himself to die. I advocate that all euthanasia should be allowed. I believe that every person has the right to decide over their own lives. We will all die eventually, and when this should be done should be up to each individual to decide. To live is a right, but also it is to die. If a person suffers from an incurable disease, she or he is free to decide if they believe that life gives meaning. Of course, the patient must be in full consciousness so that one is convinced that death is of his own free will. How can we let the man live in a state where the plague becomes his daily life? According to me it's more humane to end the suffering of the patient's request. In Sweden we have no specific laws that say that suicide is illegal. A man considered himself to be able to control their
Open Document