Death of a Naturalist Short Analysis

355 Words2 Pages
Death of a Naturalist is the eponymous poem of Seamus Heaney’s collection in 1966. The piece focuses heavily on nature. In short, the poem is about a young Heaney being fascinated with frog eggs and tadpole. The fascination becomes terror once the frogs develop into adults. Regarding conventions, Death of a Naturalist contains alliterations as well as assonances, which give it a smooth pace. The poem tries to invoke the sense by using extremely vivid imagery to describe the setting throughout the entire poem. The piece does a wonderful job of putting the reader in his shoes, and showing his childish feelings. “But best of all was the warm thick slobber” is a prime example of this. Also, he refers to the adult frogs as “mommy” and “daddy” frog, further showing his feelings as a child. Heaney also uses onomatopoeia to make the reader feel he is actually there. The last line in the first stanza, “For they were yellow in the sun and brown In rain,” seem to mark a transition. The second stanza abandons the childlike wonder, and turns much darker. The frogs are now adults and no longer fascinating. They are sinister. ” The slap and plop were obscene threats. Some sat poised like mud grenades,” shows his fear. I believe the line, “The great slime kings were gathered there for vengeance,” is the best line in the poem showing a childlike fear. I believe the poem is about growing up and losing innocence. The first half of the poem shows a child full of wonder and curiosity. As the poem progresses, it becomes obvious that childish excitement cannot stay with you forever. He discovers the world can be a scary place; that even though things start off as pleasant, they can turn ugly. It shows that he is afraid of what the world is turning into. The last few lines “I sickened, turned, and ran. The great slime kings were gathered there for vengeance and I knew that if I dipped my

More about Death of a Naturalist Short Analysis

Open Document