When the war started many American people was against it and want this to end son as possible. They were against it because United States didn´t have any trade with Vietnam or something like that. Many people give their opinions about the war in Vietnam. In the next paragraphs I am going to talk about two American groups fell about the war, the two groups are the American public and the soldiers. The first group the American public at the beginning of the war agreed with the fact that Us was helping South Vietnam, this because the president of the united States in this year told the people that they need to go to war and they have to go even if they don´t like the idea.
Rules of Engagement and Limited War Ideology Barbara A. Smith HIST 415: Vietnam & 20th Century Experience DeVry Online University Professor: Traci Sumner Submitted: February 2, 2013 The Vietnam War was a war fought by the US military using the limited war theory and Rules of Engagement (ROE). The viewpoint of what that meant to the outcome of the Vietnam War can differ from person to person. The people who fought in battle’s perception differs tremendously from the highest chain of command, who were the people with the responsibility of determining what limit to put on any conflict and what the rules of engagement would entail. They did not participate in the conflict itself. The following discusses the use of ROE and limited war theory in the Vietnam War, how six levels of command perceived them, and their impact on the outcome of the conflict.
However, bobby Kennedy had become passionately anti-war and publicly opposed the war from January 1966. Johnson privately insulted ‘Nervous Nellies’ who disagreed with him about Vietnam, calling one senator a ‘prick’, Senator Fulbright ‘Senator Halfbright’ and Bobby Kennedy ‘spineless’. Johnson considered the Kennedy-McNamara friendship dangerous. One reason why McNamara ceased to be secretary of defence is, that he wanted to decrease the fighting for the U.S and hand over the conflict to South Vietnam. In an early November 1967 memo to Johnson, McNamara's recommendation to freeze troop levels, stop bombing North Vietnam and for the U.S. to hand over ground fighting to South Vietnam was rejected outright by the President.
Compare and contrast the poems “Charge of the light brigade” and “Dulce et Decorum Est” What does each poem tell us about attitudes to war? In this essay I am going to compare and contrast two different poems and tell you what each poem tells us about the attitudes to war. The two poems that I’m going to look at are “Charge of the light brigade” and “Dulce et decorum est”. I don’t think war is necessary anymore, I think that the government are just sending young lads out for the sake of it, and taking young lad’s lives away for no proper reason. It’s like the government don’t care about the soldiers that are going out in rough ears of the world putting their lives in danger for the safety of others.
Although the Tet Offensive was unsuccessful for the North Vietnamese Army, they showed that United States had seriously underestimated them and their capabilities. The United States boasted prematurely that the war was nearing its end and the North Vietnamese were all but defeated. However those statements were discredited by the media who brought the Tet Offensive into the homes of millions of Americans which resulted in the highest disapproval of any war amongst American citizens in the history of the United States. In addition the Tet Offensive also showed that the North Vietnamese were willing to fight until the last man and that regardless of how many casualties they suffered, they would fight the United States until the end. SGT Jordan Alvarado SFC Delong 13F ALC Class 017-13 19 July 2013 The
* In 34 BCE, Aules Persius Flaccus was born. He then died in 62 BCE. * Between the years 65 and 6 BCE, Senecca and Petronius commit suicide. * Around 67 BCE, Juvenal was born. * Between 86 and 96 BCE, Martial composes Books One thru Ten of Epigrams.
Military Draft I think the military draft will be unjust for this country. A military draft would inhibit the success of the U.S. military and the military draft legislation. The military draft would inhibit the success of the military because the U.S. military relies on quality rather than quantity of people. According to Jonathan Schwitzer, editor of the Johns Hopkins News-Letter, a draft will lead to anti-American sentiment and unpatriotic behavior among those who oppose the draft or the war as it did during the Vietnam conflict. The draft will divide the nation -- see Vietnam -- and the last thing the United States needs during a time of war is a people divided, says Roger Mundy, editor of the Daily Oakland Press.
This evidence shows that the way people saw the war was changing. The people didn’t want to see their husbands, kids, friends, or their neighbors fighting in such a horrifying war. The media coverage changed the way people saw the war because it made them realize that there were thousands of Americans dying overseas in a war that they didn’t need to be involved in. The Vietnam changed people’s view about the war, “The Vietnam War was the most extensively covered war in history. This coverage was thought to have had a powerful influence on public opinion and therefore on political decision making”.
here's a short preview of this essay with formatting removed for you to read Have a little read: ... History Essay Why did the USA lose the Vietnam War? By Sameer Patel Historians believe that there were many reasons why the USA lost the war in Vietnam, ranging from domestic pressures to weak military tactics, and even perhaps failing to interpret the tenacity of their opponents. However, a few of those of involved in the war still fail to accept defeat, and are adamant that the USA were victorious. They firmly believed that they had not lost, but instead, they had blamed the fact that they were forced to withdraw due the lack of Congressional support back home. The fact that the USA had hardly lost any wars that they had engaged in prior to this one was an accomplishment that they were more than proud of, and due to a vast range of reasons, they had failed to continue and carry on with the good form.
Soldiers were brainwashed with the idea of patriotism - leading their country to victory at all costs, even if meant going into battle knowing you were going to die enforcing the message of the movie that, “The paths of glory lead but to the grave.” At first, the movie described the trench warfare situation of World War I. Then we are introduced to General Mireau who had been ordered to send his division in on a suicide mission to the well-defended German position called the “Ant Hill.” At first Mireau refuses, trying to explain the impossibility of success but as soon as a promotion for him is mentioned, he’s suddenly convinced the attack will be successful. Mireau leaves the attack to Colonel Dax, despite Dax’s protests that the attack will only result in failure and weaken his army. During a nighttime scouting mission prior to the attack, a drunken lieutenant named Roget sends one of his two men ahead as a scout. Overcome by fear waiting for the scout's return, he lobs a grenade and retreats.