David Blight Essay

986 Words4 Pages
David Blight's Misunderstanding of the UGRR: Hasty Conclusions about the Underground Railroad David Blight is among our most celebrated abolitionist historians. Gilder Lehrman Center at Yale The director of Yale’s Gilder Lehrman Center for the Study of Slavery, Resistance, and Abolition, he has been influential in perpetuating the view that the Underground Railroad was more legend than reality, and more the braggadocio of old men puffing up their achievements. His book, Race and Reunion: The Civil War in American Memory brilliantly articulated the thesis that the true story of the Civil War was distorted by apologists for the South and northerners seeking reconciliation with the South. He showed that because the South was ashamed of its role in the brutal, inhuman, and racist institution of slavery, they wanted to lay the war’s cause on other factors like economics rather than its real cause, the abolition of slavery. Underground Railroad Blight has applied this theory to the history of the Underground Railroad, and Wilbur Siebert is his proverbial bogeyman. “Siebert's work is less about the creation of reunion literature per se than about the scope and character of the audience for romantic memory of the Civil War era,” he wrote in Race and Reunion. “He tapped into a vast reservoir of Northerners eager to claim their places, or that of their parents, in a heroic legacy, this time not so much as soldiers in the war, but as veterans of the ‘old liberty life guard,’ as one Connecticut man called his father.” According to Blight, the “reality” is that the alleged network of ‘depots’ and ‘conductors’ by which fugitive slaves escaped to freedom . . . had never been as elaborate as legend portrayed it,” and he dismissed the traditional story of the Underground Railroad as “sentimental retrospection.” It takes Blight only eight pages in his 512 page
Open Document