If parents correct their children, then the children learn right from wrong. Golden’s and Shaffer’s views that toy weapons present violence are alike because they share a similar attitude towards violence. The authors believe that it is wrong to let children play with toy weapons at such an early age. Toy weapons teach them that violence solves problems, and it is the parents’ responsibility to teach their children their values in regards to violence. Another view that Golden’s and Shaffer’s articles share relates toy weapons to death.
Essay Brainstorming Your Argument: What is your opinion about your topic?I believe that video games do contribute to youth violence because the kids imitate what they see in the violent video games. These imitations include cuss words, dangerous moves, and aggressive behavior. | Your Opponent’s Argument: What is the opinion of someone who supports the other side of the issue? What does your opposition believe about your topic? The opposition believes that video games do not influence youth violence.
Researchers have given that answer in their survey’s and facts that they have found. It is up to the parents to take the problem serious and listen to facts that are given. Many disagree with the idea that video games are harmful but cannot back their opinion up with actual evidence that they have found. The more children are exposed to violent video games, the higher the chance that they will have an increase in aggressive behavior. Violent video games give off the message that killing and violence is fun instead of bad.
Children learn best from their parents. In addition to that, children will develop traits according to their parents. Therefore, toy guns and other dangerous equipments should not be introduced to little kids. Giving dangerous things as a type of reward to kids can give them the potential to form bad and unhealthy lifestyles. Grown adult should know the hazards and dangers for their kids.
“Exposure to violent video games increases the likelihood of aggressive behavior in both short-term and long-term contexts” says Daniel Willens. Children today are pretty much immune to the reality of real life killing; they think that it is acceptable to kill another person without any punishment involved. The Entertainment Software Rating Board (ESRB) rates games based on how good or bad they are for children, like EC-early childhood, E-everyone, E10+-everyone 10+,T-teens,M-mature, AO-adult only, RP-not yet rated. These are the game guides set in place to tell parents which games are acceptable for their child at a certain age. Second, sexual content is also a big factor.
Its worth the inconvenience for all our future. Peer pressure is the greatest cause of kids trying drugs. If by testing the athletes or other school leaders, we can get them to say no to drugs , it will be easier for other kids to say no. On the other hand, Amendment 4 guarantees the right to privacy and some say that is being violated by random drug searches. Some also argue that students who aren't doing anything wrong have nothing to fear.
Such statistics prove that media violence should not be tolerated. Taking the perspective into deeper meaning and thought of emotions and personality, Psychology Today indicates violent video games often results in the player’s changed personality. For instance, while it is the natural human interest to avoid aggression and help others in need, violent video games often motivate children/teenagers to take pleasure in violence by rewarding prizes and levels to those who complete the task. This instinct is often carried along with them to the rest of their life, as a possible outcome there is more cases of aggressive actions performed by
Smacking/Spanking of Children Should Not Be Banned A very debatable issue is if spanking children should be banned or not. Many people are on both sides. Some think that it is a form of discipline, and it will help the child to behave. Others think that it is a form of abuse, and if adults cannot hit adults, it should be illegal for adults to strike them. There is a difference, however, between punching your child in the face, and spanking him on the bottom when he is misbehaving.
Hitting Children Example of Physical violence such as slapping or beating , can range from a mild to strong slap in the face causing bruising and abuse of the body of the child. Some believe that attacking children as a means of discipline and as a style of education is acceptable. They also think that it teaches them not to do things and that it prevents them from what repeating the unacceptable behavior therefore making this practice effective. The imposition of control when parents use physical violence or the threat of violence to control the behavior of the child and include beatings. This method is wrong because it had bad consequences.
Cumberbatch argues that people might get "used" to screen violence but that does not mean a person will also get used to violence in real world. He claims that screen violence is more likely to make children " frightened" than " frightening". Explanations based on arousal are deterministic, as they ignored that people have self-control and moral which can prevent them from acting aggressively. -Cognitive priming refers to the idea that watching violence leads people to store memories or scripts of violent acts. These scripts are then retrieved and activated in real-life situations that are similar to what we watch on TV.