Critically Evaluate the Functionalist Perspective on the Family?

929 Words4 Pages
Religion is one of the institutions of socialization that has the most controversy. It has the most influence on how people think and live their lives and it therefore affects the wider society. It does not matter what religion you subscribe to, the basic elements remain the same for all. Religion can be defined as a system of beliefs and practices by means of which a group of people struggles with the ultimate problems of human life. Functionalist sociologists believ in the notion that religion “generates an agreed set of values, which operates in such a way as to hold society together”, however, to what extent is this a reality? Functionalist sociologist Emile Durkeim saw religion as providing the ‘social cement’ necessary if society was to survive. According to Durkeim It creates stablility, identity and a collective conscience. When indiviudals share in the same religious rituals, Durkeim belives it creates a unity in the social group between the people who share these same beliefs. Durkeim also believes this offers indivudlas an identity that is tied into that of the social group. For example, christening, baptism and confirmation in the chirstian church is a way of the group giving a social identity to the individual. Part og this identity Durkeim feels is the individual knowign their place in the social group- the individual is no longer just an individual. They are part of a wider social group in which they indentify with that group or nation and are consequently committed to it. The group shares the same set of common normalities and values that Durkeim saw as moral bonds through which individuals know what is appropriate behaivor, this generates a ‘collective conscience’ which enhances the ability of society to ‘hold together’ . The whole thurst of Durkeim’s theory is that religion does generate an agreed set of values that function to hold society
Open Document