Critical Review of Ladykillers

447 Words2 Pages
I did not know what to expect when I started watching The Ladykillers, as the title was very ambiguous, but I was pleasantly surprised. The impressive stage design and the comedic depiction of a heist conducted by eccentric individuals with piercing idiosyncrasies in the midst of a sweet and naïve elderly woman made for a very lighthearted night out. The small, cozy Vaudeville Theatre amplified the entire experience. The stage was marvelous—I was impressed from the very beginning, during the introductory sequence when the house rotated about the stage, revealing the actors within. A few minutes later, once the suspicious Professor Marcus offered his initial proposition to Mrs. Wilberforce, the entire stage rattled and the furniture slid around as a train passed nearby. It almost felt like there was an earthquake. The stage functionality was brilliantly executed. Comedy was the main theatrical element of the show and repetition was the most commonly used tool. There were many recurring gags throughout the show, and though at times you could see them coming, they were still entertaining enough to get a laugh, if not from a purely comical perspective, then from a satisfying recognition that you foresaw the joke. From the very beginning the gag involving Professor Marcus’ scarf was established, ultimately leading to his demise. The flipping of the planning board, the drug abuse and compulsive cleaning behaviors of Harry Robinson, the disharmonious string instruments playing, Harry’s phallic gestures, Major Courtney’s fascination with women’s clothing, and Louis’ fear of old women are just a portion of the recurring gags that kept the humor going. Out of all the actors, Angela Thorne, who played Mrs. Wilberforce, gave the best performance, though as far as script goes, I would say Professor Marcus had the best lines. He always managed to say something contextually

More about Critical Review of Ladykillers

Open Document