The researcher considers that it can only be done by more focusing on the method to which Husserl asserted in knowing the essence of things. With this matter, the researcher anticipates that this paper will serve as a gadfly of those people who are already enclosed by the presuppositions, beliefs, judgments, prejudices, and biases that hinders them of being a pure consciousness. It is now our concern to know and follow the ideas of Husserl in knowing the essence of things. Edmund Husserl’s Phenomenology: a means to arrive the vista of transcendentally purified phenomena. To begin this paper, it is more appropriate to talk first about the method which Husserl fashioned in order for man to get back to the things in themselves, and this method is what he called phenomenological reduction.
INTRODUCTION This assignment has been chose due to the personal experience that I can relate with. The aim of this assignment is to critique a chosen piece of journal research to analyse the accuracy and validity using a critical framework as guidelines. The article to be critiqued is located in the Journal of National Council on Family Relations (1992) which evaluates the valuing of altruism (Johnson, Haigh and Yates-Bolton (2007). The research is about of whether or not maternal employment has impact on maternal behaviour and has impact on mother-infant relationship and to investigate the mother anxiety about separation of the infant at early stage (Hock et al 1989). The research of this topic has recently become popular due to the rise of working mothers over a past decade.
The review board reviews research proposals and ensure that researchers protect participants adequately. Due to the debate and beliefs of some that Milgram's study was unethical and other similar research projects caused the Department of Health, Education and Welfare to establish regulations in 1974, for the protection of human subjects. First, to understand the reasoning behind the above action, we must look at the ethics of the Study of Obedience from two different view points. The author has given us two sides of the ethical debate from both Diana Baumrind and Stanley Milgram. To begin, we must understand the Hypothesis of Milgram's Study of Obedience.
Write a paragraph introducing the subject to the reader by 1) Over-viewing the “big-picture” of your subject, its influence on people, why it’s important to evaluate, and 2) Establish the evaluative criteria you will be using to prove your thesis. • Thesis: Your Judgment on the Subject. Write your complete thesis statement, which includes your judgment and reasons for support. The reasons are your judgments on the evaluative criteria you have identified to evaluate your subject. Use the word “because” to connect your judgment to your reasons.
With the use of Gibbs and John’s reflective model, the writer will critically examine acquisition of clinical knowledge and skills. The role of ethics in his professional development will also be explored The writer hopes to examine the strength and weakness of his practice and form conclusion and made recommendations for improving his professional development. He will examine critically inter professional collaboration in his current caring context and form conclusions and recommendation for improvement. Reference will be drawn from literatures to support the arguments and discussion, evidence based research will be used to support the views expressed. Reid (1993) defined reflection as a process of reviewing an experience of practice in order to describe, analyse, evaluate and so inform learning about practice.
Tripp (2011) proposes that reflection is a vital process of professional development. He highlights the need for practitioners to challenge their ideas and beliefs in order to change trends. Within this piece of writing, a critical incident from my beginning placement will be identified and critiqued using Tripp’s model of critical incident analyse. Tripp (1993) recommends that the process involved to analyse an incident is of great importance to influence a person’s understanding. Tripp (1993) also states that critical incidents are ‘not all dramatic or obvious- they are mostly straight forward accounts of very commonplace events’ (Tripp 1993:25).
Purpose and Research Questions: Sepsis is a condition that could potentially be prevented if a nurse was equipped with the knowledge and science in order to recognize and prevent its development, and addressing the condition appropriately upon the first signs of symptoms of sepsis. The study discussed has the objective of establishing the knowledge and understanding of nurses with relation to sepsis, identifying triggers of sepsis, and the potential nursing care that can be implemented to prevent sepsis from potentially occurring. By better understanding the potential gap regarding the subject of sepsis in nursing and closing this gap through the expansion of knowledge on the subject and the mechanism of prevention it could potentially
The articles are reviewed, arguments considered regarding the issue of PD, which stance maintains a prominent foundation, and the side contemporary research supports is explored. The Facts The premise behind the article that Devilly and Cotton (2003) published was to evaluate the consequence of PD and determine whether or not the intervention process approach is helpful or harmful and secondly to discuss provisions in workplace environments for traumatic events. The response article published by Mitchell (2004) was to defend the specific form of PD, CISD, that he developed and that Devilly and Cotton (2003) repeatedly singled out in their article. Devilly and Cotton: PD is Harmful Those with the best intentions does not equate to those intentions providing the best results. PD was developed as a preventative and speedier means of stress-response and avoidance to develop anxiety disorders, such as post-traumatic stress disorder, PTSD, when
This is considered necessary because of the inadequacies of current theories informing current counseling practice. These theories operate from both explicit and implicit assumptions that guide their practical application, and so an `assumption audit' is presented as the starting point for the authors developing MCT as an essential starting point for understanding this new theory. It's suggested (p2) that we all conduct a `critical and independent audit' of assumptions which currently underlay our counseling practice, and compare it with the one presented below. Underlying Assumptions: * Current theories of counseling and psychotherapy inadequately describe, explain, predict and
According to Lisa Macintyre’s writings on “Ethics in Research,” when doing sociological research there are various aspects to consider. One, in my opinion being the most important is taking into consideration that you must weigh out the possible consequences of your research. To be more specific Macintyre quotes, “ As far as I am concerned, the only thing is consistently unethical is to not think through the possible consequences of our research” (Mcintyre, Readings.54). I found myself nodding with agreement reading this statement because there are always consequences resulting from social research studies that vary in severity. If these consequences aren’t taken into account innocent subjects may be harmed, bad reputations can be put on yourself or your affiliates, and other various negative results.