Crime Drop in 1990's

593 Words3 Pages
During the 1990’s and into the early 2000’s many countries saw a reduction in levels of property crime. There have been many theories attempting to explain the reasons for this decrease, three of which will be examined here. Property crime, namely burglary, larceny, theft, motor vehicle theft, arson, shoplifting, and vandalism, is affected by the economy. A slow economy is often linked to higher crime rates. From that it can be said that a healthy economy would help to decrease crime rates. Some reasons for this might be that the long term unemployment rate is lower and average weekly earnings are higher. The purchasing power of the dollar tends to be greater and people are more likely to be able to purchase items legitimately rather than steal them. Over the time period there were developments in security technology which enabled people to fit immobilisers into motor vehicles as well as burglar alarms and security screens into residences. Research has shown that both these devices reduce offences respectively. Another factor which was instrumental in reducing the prevalence of property crime was the rising prison population. Convicted criminals who were incarcerated were dealt more severe sentences, revocation of parole increased and more drug related offences meant generally a higher number of people were imprisoned. The fact that more of these criminals were incarcerated meant they were not out on the streets to reoffend. Prison is also seen as a deterrent for those who have been incarcerated previously. Cesare Beccaria, in An Essay on Crimes and Punishments (1764) states his view that “deterrence, not pain, is the purpose of punishment”. Increased police numbers also assist with the reduction of property crime, particularly when the police have the opportunity to work with other agencies in combined efforts towards crime prevention. Not only
Open Document