Coso Fraud Study

486 Words2 Pages
COSO Fraud Study 1. How big of a problem is fraudulent financial reporting? Fraudulent financial reporting not only misleads the financial statement users to make wrong decision but also have negative impacts on various aspects of companies. For example, companies could be involved in lawsuits and suffer huge profit loss or negative stock reaction. Based on the data, more frauds occurred in the recent 10 years than the last decade. The total cumulative misstatement or misappropriation was nearly $120 billion across 300 fraud cases with available information during the period 1998-2007, which implied the size of the fraud was becoming larger. Therefore, the government must spend more money to resolve the situation. 2. Who are the perpetrators? According to the name list of perpetrator developed by AAERs, most frequently named senior executive was the chief executive officer (CEO). The CEO was named and involved in 246 of 342 fraud companies, which occupying 72 percent of the sample companies with available information. The second most frequently named senior executive is the chief financial officer (CFO), which is named in 222 of the 342 fraud companies. The company controller, chief operating officer, other vice president and some lower level personnel are also frequent named in the list. In addition, 24 percent of the case involved some outsiders, including customers, vendors, external auditor and members of the audit committee. 3. What is happening with corporate governance? During the research by COSO, specific procedures were developed to provide a reasonable basis for the comparison for the samples of fraud and no-fraud companies. The result indicated that there is no much significant difference between many board of director characteristics of fraud and non-fraud firms. 4. Are auditors doing a good job? Auditors are doing a better job over time.

More about Coso Fraud Study

Open Document