With the lack of soldiers, it would be easier to invade Rome, which could’ve led to the decline of the Empire. This proves that internal decay was one of the major causes for the end of Rome. Document 6 shows the invasions of Barbarians in 476 on the Roman Empire. This demonstrates that the government and military were becoming weaker to the point where they weren’t strong enough to protect the empire from invasions. The government could not control all these invasions, so this was another component that helped the fall of the Roman Empire.
This made the Romans prone to injuries and “because they have no armor, think about running and not fighting” (Document B). Because of the loss of troops from the loss of armour, the Roman army’s numbers diminished. No soldiers were drafted since many groups were exempted from joining the army. This lessened the defences and security of Rome, and Rome became weaker. Another primary reason of Rome’s decline was a series of foreign invasions.
The reason for this is because the army couldn’t defend the empire. Due to the army not being able to defend the empire, other regions quickly stepped up and tried to make the empire part of their own. The barbarians succeeded, and the Barbarian General Odoacer simply deposed the boy Emperor Romulus Augustulus and took the empire for himself. Another reasonable cause of the Roman Empire would be bankruptcy. Its leaders who became far too selfish and self-absorbed bankrupted Rome.
Rome had started Lack of stability and high power but a weak government. As the empire was getting weak invasions stared to happen. This problem helps explain why Rome “fell” because as the government was growing weak the empire was slowly falling down. Reason two is Military issues. The purpose of having a Military is to protect a country/ nation and
They stopped wearing breastplates and helmets and didn't practice drills, so that when barbarians attacked, they weren't ready. Another reason for the Roman Army's weakness was they were too relaxed on their draft. Bureaucrats, clergymen and senators were excluded from the draft aside from cooks, bakers and slaves. With a smaller and weaker army, it made it much harder to defend Rome's borders. Rome fell because of weakness caused by its size, by its pestilences and natural disasters, and by the weaknesses of its army.
This profit margin made the risk worth taking for many, resulting in the government losing money due to be not paying duty tax. Pitt saw this problem and decided to reduce the level of duty tax of these products, in the Commutation Act of 1784. In addition, he also amended the Hovering Act of 1780, meaning that officials could now search ships, therefore making smuggling a lot more difficult. Furthermore, to encourage legitimate trade, Pitt introduced ‘Bonded Warehouses’ which allowed legitimate traders to store their goods in these warehouses tax-free as long as they were planning to export these to another country. Although the problem of smuggling had to be overcome, exportation in Britain was booming.
The failure of foreign policy in the years 1514-1525 can be attributed to many things. The combination of Henry's isolation from European affairs and the fact that his attempts to raise tax were ultimately unpopular failures, meant that he had no way to impose himself upon Europe. Even when he did manage to scrape together the finances needed for a strong foreign policy his reliance on his allies led to disaster. As soon as Henry took the throne in 1509, it was obvious that he was a king that wanted to fight a war. However, wars generally led to very expensive costs to the country.
Unnecessary military spending because of overexpansion and inability to expand further because of lack of new land to conquer is another theory. Yet another theory is that the immigration of Gothic Tribes and then mistreatment of the Gothics may have caused the immigrants to revolt. But the one thing that truly brought down Rome, and encompasses many of the other theories in its web of destruction, is the
Caesar's own personality was a key role to his own death making him as guilty as everyone else. If Caesar was a caring ruler he might have survived his assassination but unfortunately he was the stereotypical leader and only cared for the good of himself. Even though the empire was stopped before Caesar could rule it, the republic did not last much longer anyway. Caesar's death was not much of an effect on Rome but nonetheless it was Caesars fault. Caesar was arrogant, hubris and full of pride.
By exiling the Huguenots he lost a lot of potential revenue, and the lavish building of Versailles was not cheap. Moreover, he did not have the revenue to keep up his enormous army and after the early 1680’s his success in wars went in a never ending downward spiral. Perhaps if Louis XIV had learned to manage his money better and not gone to war so readily, his subjects would have been happier and he would have had an even more successful reign, but without a doubt he still remains one of the most powerful rulers in