Contingency Theories of Leadership

1392 Words6 Pages
Contingency Theories of Leadership To successfully run an organization, many aspects must work together to ensure that everything runs efficiently and effectively. A major part to the effectiveness of the organization internally is leadership among the organizations staff members. But what is leadership and why is it important? We define leadership as the ability to influence group towards the achievement of a vision or set of goals (Robbins et al 2011). Without being able to communicate, direct and inspire people like leaders do, organizations would struggle to be successful as they would not be able to do effectively communicate visions and help overcome hurdles to the best of their ability. To help identify what makes effective leadership several studies have been conducted and theories have been developed to help understand the fundamentals behind it. One central aspect of leadership is the contingency theories of leadership. Contingency theories refer to leaders altering leadership styles depending on the particular circumstances. The relationship between leadership style and effectiveness suggested that, under condition a, style x would be appropriate, whereas style y was more suitable for condition b, and style z for condition c (Robbins et al 2011). Over the last several decades many researchers have studied into the different contingency theories. At the present time the four main theories are: Fiedler’s contingency mode, House’s Path-goal theory, Hersey and Blanchards situational theory and the leader-member exchange theory. First of all Fiedler’s contingency model proposes that effective group performance depends on the proper match between the leader’s style and the degree to which the situation gives the leader control (Robbins et al 2011). He believed that the success of the leader is dependent on their individual leadership style and orientation,

More about Contingency Theories of Leadership

Open Document