Condoms: The New Diploma

1019 Words5 Pages
In the essay “Condoms: The New Diploma” Rush Limbaugh explains to readers how the distributions of condoms and sex education programs are promoting sex more than preventing it. Limbaugh continues to explain that public schools should be going back to more of the traditional methods such as abstinence to help prevent STD’s and possibly early teen pregnancies. Overall, the argument being made by Limbaugh is sound. I agree with Limbaugh’s first sentence, “The logic and motivation behind this country’s mad dash to distribute free condoms in our public school is ridiculous and misguided.” This instantly reveals Limbaugh’s opposing stance towards the subject of condoms being distributed to young students in school. When schools pass items such as condoms around, kids can easily get the impression that it’s okay to use them. In this sentence he is trying to reach out and appeal to the parents, and older adults who have the same feeling as he does. Limbaugh believes that the distribution of condoms is not only promoting kids to have sex, but is also giving them the idea that condoms prevent all the consequences of sex. In the second paragraph Limbaugh states that, “Kids will have sex anyway, and that this logic leads to schools providing drugs, and bullet proof vests.” Although providing drugs may seem a little extreme, and maybe a little crazy, I would have to agree with Limbaugh. If schools are handing out condoms to students, what would the difference be if they are handing out drugs? He is trying to reach out to the readers that sex isn’t the only bad issue that kids are exposed to, and that they are exposed to much more serious problems as well. Issues such as drug abuse, and exposure to guns are but a few listed, so Limbaugh say’s if we’re going to hand out condoms, why not hand out more stuff to young adults such as packs of cigarettes with low tar. Limbaugh

More about Condoms: The New Diploma

Open Document