In my opinion, although it is hard to say whether intelligence is limited or not, intellectual abilities are differ from people. The majority of people cannot reach their own high level of intelligence. If they are trained in a scientific way, their intelligence can be improved. One attempt called Project Intelligence based on the computational metaphor is to improve cognitive competencies. This experiment took place in a school for one year.
Plimpton 322 Questions Question A: I think that Buck’s interpretation was extremely incorrect. He used modern math to find patterns shown in Plimpton 322. He did not take into account if the Babylonian’s had knowledge of the equations that he used. He did find patterns, but it is easy to find patterns in math, especially when using advanced theories. It was as if he was searching for how to plug their math into ours, not the other way around.
There he was taught by Dini and Bianchi who quickly influenced Fubini to undertake research in geometry. He presented his doctoral thesis Clifford's parallelism in elliptic spaces in 1900. In October 1901 Fubini began teaching at the University of Catania in Sicily, and in 1908 Fubini moved to Turin where he taught both at the Politecnico and at the University of Turin. Fubini created a theorem very significant to our Calculus 3 class at Miramar college. His theorem makes it possible to change the order of integration with double integrals, which is used to find area under a plane.
For Newton the calculus was geometrical while Leibniz took it towards analysis. According to "Http://mathforum.org/dr.math/faq/analysis_hyperreals.html" (1994-2015), the two founders of infinitesimal calculus results were the same, their motivations and interpretations were different. Leibniz established his calculus based on differential quantities, ratios (derivatives), and infinite sums (integrals). Newton, used notions of speed and motion, very apparent by his terminology of "fluent" for functions and "fluxions" for derivatives. Both established an excellent perception of the infinitesimals and found regular rules, lemmas, and theorems, by thinking of notions such as dy/dx in the context of a change in y less than any assignable quantity divided by a change in x less than any other assignable quantity.
Sometimes it's easier if everything for a project is done in 1/2 or 1/4 scale. If you can't do that kind of simple math then do not work in large format. Math is also used when calculating your image resolution, the more pixels in the resolution the better the quality of the image will be. If you have a client who is asking you on the phone if a photo is any good, you can do the math or open Photoshop real quick and use the New File box. But you have to know where to put your numbers and what your numbers mean.
Raymond L. Barreto Chang April 24, 2012 PSY 130 K. Falge Getting to Know Your Personal Learning Style I think my preferred learning style is Logical-Mathematical since I like Math and I also like to do put stuff in order. I like to work with numbers rather than words and like to look for solution to problems using logical reasoning. Also I like to ask questions to get to the root of the issue. I like puzzles; I also can estimate measurements and enjoy science experiments. Logical (Mathematical) Learning Style When it comes to understanding and remembering new information, you feel most comfortable when you use logic, reasoning, and systems thinking.
Descriptive and Inferential Statistics Paper Alistair Taylor, José Interiano, Myvia Jones & Nakia Thompson PSY 315 – Statistical Reasoning in Psychology Gina Pendergrass February 17, 2014 Statistical Methods in Psychology In the field of psychology, researchers rely on different methods to summarize data in a concise and clear manner. Part of these methods include statistics—a mathematical branch that focuses on organizing, analyzing, and interpreting large groups of numbers (Aron, Aron, Coups, 2009). The role of statistics in the research process is to present complex mathematical equations and their results in a less convoluted manner. In other words, make sense of the results through a high-level overview—so to speak. There are level of statistical methods, however, that break-down such data even further with specific formulas and intends behind them—one of them being an even easier way summarize the research in order to conclude it.
1.05 Lesson activity Geometry Debate: Choose Argument A By: Larry Kramer I feel that there is a real need for students to understand that when creating geometric shapes, it’s necessary to make sure you have reliable and accurate tools. You know the straight edge and the compass? There are always two sides to every story and every argument has two different ideas. When you look at this argument it’s almost a "no brainer" but when you think about each side they both have rational points. When making geometric shapes the first thing you need is your compass and straight edge for accuracy.
The correspondent truths are argued to be the most adjoining to the absolute, however this argument quickly can be proved inadequate, due to truths not being universal. The mathematician and scientist Galileo (1564-1642) said that: “The book of nature is written in the language of mathematics.” Since the scientific revolution started in the 17th century mathematics has become even more important now than it was then. When searching for the truth, we tend to use mathematics as a place to start, because the statement 2+2 = 4 is of relatively high certainty. Thus, if someone asked you “What in the world are you most certain about?” 2+2 = 4 probably would be the answer. Why?
An advantage of a survey is that you can get lots of data in a relatively short space of time and a disadvantage is that the responses may not always be specific. The most common form of qualitative research is face to face interview which is basically a meeting with someone to discuss various issues. Quantitative data is data that is usually in the form of numerical or statistical data while qualitative data is a categorical measurement expressed not in the terms of numbers but rather by a means of a natural language description. One way to acquire quantitative data is surveys while participant and non participant observations , case studies and unstructured interviews to get qualitative data. If the researcher decides to use any of the quantitative research method , they should always consider the size, cost and the purpose of the research whereas with the qualitative, they should take into