Compare Sources C and D as Evidence for the Problems Faced by South Vietnam.

585 Words3 Pages
Sources C and D both suggest that South Vietnam was under attack from communist forces. In source C, the French President claims that the “regime established in the north aimed to impose itself also in South Vietnam”, and source D, President Johnson explains that if the US abandoned South Vietnam the, “terror that must follow, would be an unforgivable wrong”. President de Gaulle's views were made at a press conference in Paris (1694), and President Johnson's views were from a speech (1965), therefore, both sources have limited reliability, because the points made are aimed towards the public. In Johnson's speech, comments made about South Vietnam such as “build and defend its independence... dishonour this promise... abandon this small, brave nation”, suggests that the former President was attempting to defend US involvement in Vietnam, and atleast to try and appease the US nation, as public opinion about the situation in Vietnam was strongly against any more further involvement in Vietnam. In addition, it was typical of Johnson to try and defend his actions, because he wouldn't want to be seen in the wrong. However, source C is more reliable, because the French President isn't fighting for any sides, and highlights key problems such as a communist state in Tonkin, and the threat from North Vietnam, whereas Johnson seemed more concerned in justifying his actions by trying to win over US public opinion rather than giving actual facts. Nevertheless, both sources are useful, because source C highlights the problems in South Vietnam, and although mentioned briefly in source D, it also shows what Johnson's aims were at time regarding the situation – that South Vietnam couldn't be left defenceless, because of Johnson's strong belief in the Domino theory. In Source D, the US President Lyndon Johnson makes it clear that the aims of the US in South Vietnam is to
Open Document