Economically, the trading and the crops played a big role in the differences as well. Religion varied in both colonies and had affected the colonists. These aspects show the clear distinctions between these two colonies and how they provided a split between them. In these early colonies, class ranks were similar to one’s identity. The higher the class, the more respect and privilege they receive; the lower the class, the less privileges received.
Despite its imperfections, the Articles were able to provide the Colonies ability to conduct diplomacy and a sense of colonial unity. However it lacked many aspects to make a strong governmental organization. One of which is, the inability to regulate currency. During the Revolution, many colonies lacked any form of effective currency and as a result they developed their own state currency. Over time the currency lost its value due to inflation which devastated colonial economies.
In the Han and Roman societies technology was turning into a main consideration in many residents' regular lives. Nonetheless, the state of mind with respect to the utilization of the mechanical developments alternate in a few ways being that some individuals were positive of these uses and others were angry against the new employments of innovation or generally receptive on how it could get to be better. In many situations, there were some residents that did not agree with the technology advances and were not pleased with it. In the first century CE, an upper-class Roman philosopher elaborates on how individuals who get to be creators are not best in class in light of the fact that individuals dependably enhance their creations. Discussing with the public, he tries to express that developments will dependably be enhanced, how productive is it in fact, in the event that it is never taking care of business.
New England, in general, was well-organized and sturdy in comparison to Jamestown’s swampy land and unequipped settlers. Immigrants who settled in the Chesapeake area seemed to have been little affected by religious motives. However, religion influenced many settlers in New England. Unlike Separatists, this Congregationalist man wanted to reform the Church of England rather than abolish it. He and other Congregationalists believed Charles I was more hostile to the Puritans than his father had been.
That opportunity, however, was at the cost of their fellow man. For those born in the colonies, economic opportunity was readily available, but there was always the obstacle of the social structure. Also, different religions dominated various regions, such as the Puritans in Massachusetts (though by this time, their presence in government was loosening). For example, Catholics were not
They came for a variety of reasons, but all wanted a better life. Carving a better life out of the vast wilderness the early colonists found in North America challenged even the hardiest of those early pioneers. In England and in much of Europe, the poor were chronically unemployed, and opportunities to rise out of poverty were scarce; by comparison, almost any alternative might have seemed promising, Europe in 1600 had lots of push. On the other hand, conditions in early America were difficult, to say the least, but the “pull factor” was helped by what can only be characterized as propaganda. Proprietors of the companies that sponsored American colonies quickly realized that settlers were needed if their investments were to show a return, and their efforts to recruit settlers made the New World appear far more attractive than conditions warranted.
May-Lee Hoshi Modern World History 2B Bapi DBQ 17: Imperialism in India: An Evaluation European Imperialism in the late nineteenth and twentieth centuries converted areas of Africa and Asia into a colonial empire that had really benefited the British. The Imperialism in India allowed the British to improve socially and economically without any negative consequences, while India, the colony, made great strides, but paid the price through lack of independence and the inability to develop as an industrial state. Both the colony and colonizers had a different point of view on what was happening to the countries. The British, the colonizers, believed that they were doing the countries a favor by helping India. British had introduced to the colony many new manufactured goods, technology, education, means or transportation and most importantly, better and quicker ways of communication (Document 1).
The latter colony posessed an excellent harbor. However, their cold climate and thin soil limited plantations. Therefore, they turned to fishing, shipbuilding and trade. Second of all, the reasons for the creation of these colonies also pose as differences. Economic motives encouraged the colonization in Virginia.
This religious association doesn’t stem necessarily from the fact that these were royal colonies because England was ignoring what was going on in these colonies at the time, and they were simply built and operated for business purposes. All of these colonies were established to produce and export cultivation such as rice and tobacco in Virginia and the Carolinas. People who came to these colonies were mainstream Anglican indentured servants who did not come to the new world for religion, but simply for the land and/or money. North Carolina was the product of the split in the earlier colony of Carolina. South Carolina was much more profitable colony while North Carolina was rarely noticed by the crown.
Augustus introduced Sumptuary Laws which curbed the extremely decadent behavior of the upper class minority, ensuring Rome’s growing prosperity did not undermine traditional values. Jones approves of these laws, stating that “the Roman people… were in dire need of reform”. Augustus also believed religion was crucial in returning to Rome’s former traditional values and wanted to revive the belief that ‘pietas’ would maintain Rome’s success, as supported by Galinsky who believes the core of the social reforms was the revitalization of religion. His main moral legislation, however, aimed at limiting wrongful behaviors including adultery, divorce, and a lack of marriage and child-bearing. The Lex Iulia de Adulteriis Coercendis focused on punishing the crime of adultery, for which people could be exiled or even killed.