Comparative Essay: River Valley Civilizations

542 Words3 Pages
While ancient Egyptian and Mesopotamian societies are very similar they can be different in some ways too. In the Middle East, in Mesopotamia, before the Common Era, the first civilizations began to appear. Then Egypt’s Nile River Valley began to populate soon after. These civilizations began to thrive and develop their own politics, economies and social class structures. Even though they were very similar, they did have their differences. Both of these civilizations were based on a monarchy/bureaucracy. Each had a supreme leader that stated he got his power to rule from the gods. But there were also bureaucrats to run the extensive area these civilizations once ruled that the king could not control by himself. Trade was an essential part of these societies. The bazaars and town markets where this trading took place was a place rich with many different cultures, foods, farming supplies and techniques, the latest weaponry, politics and news. Without this, these civilizations would’ve advanced slower and there would’ve been a high possibility that they would’ve become ethnocentric much like the early Chinese civilizations were. But trade was inevitable where the Egyptian and Mesopotamian societies grew. They each lived on flat planes around large rivers where it would be pretty easy to communicate to the other societies around them. Bu t the most important part of each societies’ economy is their agriculture. Without food they would starve, but in order to grow this food they would need water and fertile, arable land. That is why most early civilizations grew up around large sources of fresh water. Both of their social statuses were based on a rigid class structure. So if you were born a peasant farmer, you primarily stayed that way their whole lives. The only exception is if they would be captured during a battle and taken prisoner. Then they would either become
Open Document