It was quality for this class because it incorporated the lines of mixer web’s fight on today’s social group. It is somewhat hyperbolic and unrealistic to workaday story but it test that Facebook and social web place are not all good. In general, I didn’t really like the picture show just in the sense that it scares me. I am the type of human body that can easily trust others and this movie second opine that whole idea. I also didn’t like that we didn’t find out where the real Megan was.
The interview would also put pressure on us by looking at that us all the time instead of writing something down to make it look professional. I would also sometimes speak too fast which showed I was nervous which wasn’t good for the role play we was doing. How we could have improved the interview There are many ways we could have improved the interview for example we could have practice the role play and remembered the lines better. The interviewer could have pretended to write something which would have put less pressure on me which would have made me less nervous. At the end instead of only asking 2 questions I could have asked one more which would look really professional.
Zoro’s relationship with Rose, a fellow artist in the film, is also a major theme as it is a concern for the character as he develops his art. The culture development in the film depicts how the development of modern culture struggled during their birth and corruption of such at that age would mean no culture today. There is more than just music to be learned from the film of Wild Style that is highly attractive even today. Many more people can learn from the characters that were used, their behavior and so forth. This after all is the purpose of creating films, to educate people about a certain subject that is familiar to the eye but understood differently by the minds.
Movie observers have their favorite kind of film they love to watch. By that, we disregard certain films because it does not fit into the mold of what we think a film should look like. We should keep in mind that all films will not fit our preconceived notions. To become a receptive viewer we must be willing to venture beyond the norm. Films are not only for entertainment and are not only for profound artistic statements.
If the movie had more detail it would be more interesting. The book gave me a better picture. When I saw the movie it confused me because it didn’t have all the parts. If I just saw the movie I wouldn’t understand why Greasers and Socs were separated and why they hated each other. I think Cherry did a really good job; she fit the description really well I think.
A lot of things could have been handled differently if only Hitch and Sara have communicated better. One fight they had could have been avoided if they would have just communicated. It takes them awhile to talk things out and communicate. At the end of the movie they did end up communicating together and working things out. I believe that communication is very important in a relationship.
If he hadn’t met her, got to know her and be close friends with her he wouldn’t have found out about the other “replayers.” He also wouldn’t learn about other things that Pamela had taught or talked about such as kids, movies and how long they would replay until the next replay. Therefore, the past is essential to who we are because of the people we associate with. The second reason of why the past is essential to who we are in the future is because of our mistakes. In the novel, Jeff and Pamela the “replayers” searched diligently for other replayer’s. When they finally find’s another “replayer” they contact him and make arrangements to meet.
Can’t I simply ignore the nuisance? Is it really worth it to emit an ugly sound, which grates on my ears as well, which may distract others from the movie and may distract others from the movie and may draw on my head some physical retaliation against which I am ill-prepared to defend myself, or else some unpleasant curse? Here, the author clearly shows his purpose with his process of telling people to be quiet, but it’s not in a serious tone. He’s telling it with a flare of humor which adds a bit of irony. The author’s arrogant tone is also clearly shown when he was trying to hold himself back from telling the two ladies to stop talking.
I’ve heard people refer to “The Notebook” as cheesy, as a ‘chick flick’ (a label very few of my colleagues can stand because of its negative connotation), as predictable and sappy. So “The Notebook” doesn’t exactly take a brain surgeon to guess how the story is going to play out. And it does unapologetically play on your emotions, practically begging you to squeeze out a few tears. But here’s why I enjoyed “The Notebook”: it’s a movie you can relax and let flow over you. It’s also one of the few films out there that tells a complete story.
The results of my IAT concluded that I have a moderate automatic preference for light skin compared to dark skin. While taking the test, I knew the response that I wanted to put but because of the switching around I would accidently press the wrong letter. I guess in my mind I was trying to move fast while keeping up with the constant change. I feel as though the test should've given a little to no preference result for me. My impression of the IAT is that it may be accurate, but it really depends on the person taking it.