Color Blind Racism

734 Words3 Pages
Color Blind Racism In Bonilla-Silva's piece the The Central Frames of Color-Blind Racism he explains in detail the four frames of color-blind racism: abstract liberalism, naturalization, cultural racism, and minimization of racism. Bonilla-Silva believes that although most whites have abandoned the idea that blacks are in part to blame for their own oppression and lower class status, racism still exists. Color-blind racism has replaced the formerly established idea of racism, but this does not mean hope for the oppressed. Bonilla-Silva does agree that minorities are much better off today, but he believes that because blacks have become so far behind in the order of society it might be impossible for them to catch up to the whites. Color- blind racism is contemporary way of thinking about race that justifies and rationalizes racial inequalities. He claims that whites use the frames of color-blind racism to ignore the truths of racial inequality and to minimize the issues that surround it. He explains the terms of each frame of color-blind racism used by whites he goes into specific detail using various stories, examples, and interviews from different white perspectives in order to prove his point. The first point that Bonilla explains is abstract liberalism. Abstract liberalism hides all the institutional policies put in place by a country founded upon slavery, social, political, and economic inequality as if power and privilege is not still in the hands of those generations of the white upper-class who aren’t so far removed from our very recent past of blatant racial violence, economic disinvestment such as (exclusion of Blacks from land-ownership, public accommodations, equal access to jobs, housing, education), and political and legal discrimination (lack of legal help, lack of political representation, criminalization, racial profiling). Variations of

More about Color Blind Racism

Open Document