Why did the collapse of communism not lead to a prosperous, democratic, and friendly Russia?
As one of the super powers in the past, it is highly interesting to know the Soviet Union collapsed. It was considered as the legitimate successor of the Russian Empire. Throughout the world, it was then famous for the advanced scientific research that it conducted on weaponry and space technology. More importantly, this country was famous because it provided aid to developing countries, economic stability and military strength. It was also part of the United Nations Security Council, which served as one of the most influential nations in the world.
Consequently, the collapse of communism not leads to a prosperous, democratic, and friendly Russia; because we see economic as the underlying cause of the soviet collapse. Earlier, the soviet economy had grown by dumping in more imputes, but long-term growth requires increasing productivity (efficiency). Fearing technological backwardness. Some members of the soviet elite welcomed Gorbachev and his glasnost, perestroika, and ‘’ New thinking’’ in soviet foreign policy. He intended only to reform the soviet system; instead he collapsed it. Gorbachev never had the sound vision of the future; he thought he could ‘’ fix up’’ communism. Meanwhile, some of the more liberal party members quit and won election as non-communists. In 1991, Boris Yeltsin won the presidency of Russia.
‘’With the Cold War over, Africa as a whole no longer matters to us. We should ignore it’’. Agree or disagree.
U.S. relations with Africa have always come low on the list of overall U.S. foreign policy interests, after Europe, Asia, the Middle East, and the Americas. This prioritization is logical in terms of overall global U.S. strategic, political, and economic interests. At the same time, in a striking anomaly, during 1993 nearly 30,000 members of the U.S. armed forces were deployed in Africa at one time or another. Army and Marine units were primarily...