Classical Management Essay

1248 Words5 Pages
Authority Structure VS Classical Management Introduction Nowadays, many organizations are suffering from managerial problems. According to (Samson & Daft, 2005), tooling the plants, and organizing managerial structure, training employees and labor dissatisfaction are becoming main issues in organization management. A theory called Classical Management came out which makes organizations run smoothly. There are three key subfields under classical management, which are scientific management, bureaucratic organizations and administrative principles. These subfields effects management in whole. Max weber is famous for his theory of authority structures, this theory is also a part of Bureaucratic Organizations –which is under classical management. He clearly differentiates authority from power, he believes that power means forcing people to follow the command while authority means people will voluntarily finish the task from leaders. Authority structures have 3 pure types, which are labelled ‘charismatic’, ‘traditional’ and ‘rational-legal’. These are introduced in detail below. Discussion Authority structure Charismatic is the first mode of exercising authority, which emphasis on leaders’ personal quality (Samson & Daft, 2005). Charismatic is a Greek term, in this case it means leaders can normally attract and effect clients and workers, this kind of leader has ability to change people’s attitude towards working. Leaders’ glamour has nothing to do with his social position or personal duties. This type of management structure fits in small-scale organizations, the risk of charismatic authority mode has a built-in instability. Organization will be in trouble once the leader died. Very typically, within religious and political organization, people will insist that many disciples are the right one to be the next leader. Organization would be in a mess if the
Open Document