Classical Conditioning and Operant Conditioning

327 Words2 Pages
There are a lot of theories of learning a behavior in psychology. One of them is classical conditioning which means a learning process in which an organism's behavior becomes dependent on the occurrence of a stimulus in its environment and we involuntarily acted learned behavior. One of the most famous experiments was when Ivan Pavlov made experiments with dogs. He rings a bell and then feeding them. After a while, he could ring the bell and their mouths would drool, because he learned to relate the bell with the food. That shows that the dog became unconscious. That also happens to the human be like me when I smell my favorite food I feel hungry. Unconditioned Stimulus Food Unconditioned Response Salivation Conditioned stimulus Bell Conditioned Response Salivation Those were the key concepts of classical conditioning. The unconditioned stimulus it’s something that is naturally and automatically and the unconditioned response is the unlearned response that occurs naturally in response to the unconditioned stimulus. The conditioned stimulus is the action which causes a reaction (bell) and the conditioned response is the learned response to the previously conditioned stimulus. The other theory of learning is operant conditioning which is the opposite of classical conditioning. In operant conditioning we freely choose to act. We learn what to do or not to do depending on the results. It was used by B.f Skinner. There are four types of Operant Conditioning the Positive Reinforcement, Negative Reinforcement, positive Punishment, and negative Punishment. Both Positive and Negative Reinforcement strengthen and increase behavior while both Punishments weaken the behavior. For example we may continue to go to work each day because we receive a paycheck. However If we receive awards for working overnight, we may be more likely to increase the hours for working
Open Document