However, the vehicle appeared to have committed a traffic violation based off of Smith’s perception. In the case of Whren v. United States, this case can back up Smiths’ reason to pull the driver over based off of probable cause to believe a traffic violation has occurred. Once Officer Smith began to approach the automobile, she then had reasonable suspicion of the vehicle based off of its description of an earlier crime. This gives law enforcement a reason to conduct a pat down. The pat down of the driver was very much legal based off of reasonable suspicion of the vehicle’s description.
Since he was not the one who actually stole the car and it was not his idea, I would use the opportunity to guide him in the process of making better choices. First it would be imperative that he admits the remorse and then I would want to work on the responsible decision making. Critical – Evaluative Level 1. Rules, professional codes consulted, state laws, etc. - After referring to the ACA Code of Ethics (ACA, 2005) I found that under section B.
This raises the issue of responsibility. In making an ethical judgement, it is not enough to decide what is right to do or what should have been done in a certain case. It is also necessary to decide to what extent one is or was responsible for doing what is right. It is certainly wrong for the driver of a car to crash into another car parked by the side of the road; but if the driver had lost control of his car because he suffered a heart attack or if he didn't see the parked car, he cannot be blamed for the accident, unless he could have avoided the circumstances that led to it. In the case of an individual act, assessing responsibility is relatively straightforward.
Ethical Challenges Ethical challenges that arise as an advocator and a mediator simultaneously include the ethical responsibility of acting with integrity and honesty (University of Phoenix, 2011). The ethical responsibility that involves information obtained through advocacy includes not crossing boundaries that could incite a client to commit a hate crime (University of Phoenix, 2011). Moral and Legal Challenges Moral and legal challenges can occur when performing the duties of an advocator and a mediator. These types of challenges can occur when the roles of advocator and mediator conflict with the policies of the agency. Confidentiality of a client can be a challenge when switching the role of an advocate to become the mediator.
The reason it is relevant to organizational decisions because law enforcement organizations have to decide what punishments and measures of control to put in place in efforts of eliminating or minimizing the issue. It is relevant to personal decisions because people have to decide whether they are willing to take the risk and if they are caught whether the potential consequences are worth the risk. The relationship between legal aspects, and the ethical aspects of using a cell phone while driving is consequences. Legally the consequences of using a cell phone while driving are traffic tickets, fines, and jail time depending on the severity. Ethically the consequences of using a cell phone while driving are guilt, and embarrassment depending on the circumstances.
Emily Burleson 1/15/2013 Mr. Zimmer CJ227 Police Encounters with Suspects and Evidence Did Officer Smith have a reasonable suspicion to make the initial traffic stop? One of the more dangerous jobs an officer has is traffic stops. “The officer never knows what will happen during that stop and must stay alert so nothing can happen to the officer (Anti Essays)”. Officer Smith had reasonable suspicion to pull the car over for a broken taillight, which is a traffic violation, and can receive a “fix-it” ticket or a “correctable violations” ticket. Plus the car she pulled over matched the description of a vehicle that killed a fellow officer.
The purpose also is if law enforcement was to take the evidence it would not be used in the court of law unless issue or that person can be set free of all charges. Basically one wrong moved can make us lose a suspect of a horrible crime if we are not careful. Law enforcement just need to be cautious so they are doing their jobs correct, and setting a person free will get them into trouble (cjlf.org, 2011). When we are identifying the exclusionary rule it is a great rule to have so police have to stop and think. Police have to think before they search because it could cost them a lot if they just do what they want.
Integrating the two roles can be challenging ethically, morally, and legally because mediation transpires when parties advocate different positions. An ethical challenge of assuming the dual-role of advocate and mediator is that of conflict of interest. For example, the main interest for the advocate is to support their cause, whereas the main interest for the mediator is to stay neutral and not take sides. Meaning, the mediator does not support a specific cause. A moral challenge of the dual-role of an advocate and mediator is that of moral conflict.
In the body of a Rogerian argument, the writer gives an objective statement of her or his position, again trying to avoid loaded and attacking language and trying not to imply that this position is somehow better then audience’s position. Writer explains the contexts in which his or her position is valid and explores how they are different from the audience’s. the gun registration writer might note that gun collections are frequently target for thieves, and point out that registration might help the owners retrieve such stolen property before it is used to commit a crime. To conclude, the writer finally presents the thesis, usually phrased in such a way that shows the audience that the writer has made some concessions toward the audience’s positions. For instance, the gun registration writer might believe that this law should only apply to new sales of handguns, not to guns the audience already owns.
More issues that could occur would be ethical. This would include issues like covert participation which would be unethical because the participants would be unaware that they were being researched. Another ethical issue would be consent as