Martin Luther King Vs. Thoreau's Civil Disobedience

1389 Words6 Pages
Oxholm 1 Olivia Oxholm Cole AP Lang October 7, 2012 Civil Disobedience and Letter From A Birmingham Jail Comparison In writing Civil Disobedience , Thoreau attempts to motivate the American people to change. He stresses the responsibility of citizens to protest and take action against corrupt and unjust laws of the government. His angry disposition is obvious from the beginning through the fact that he chooses to start with the statement that “government is best which governs least” and takes it a step further to say that “government is best which governs not at all”. Meaning, that the most ideal form of government is one that enforces the least amount of power over its people. As for Martin Luther King Jr., he also writes to show…show more content…
Both King and Thoreau effectively utilize all three of these in their essays. King, however, uses more pathos in his argument. By asking many rhetorical questions he attempts to sympathize with his audience, making them feel that their ideas are valid and important, even though he is just preparing to refute them. For example, on page 2, King says, “You may well ask, 'Why direct action, why sit-ins, marches, and so forth? Isn't negotiation a better path?' You are exactly right in your call for negotiation. Indeed, this is the purpose of direct action.” (King 2). By confirming the thoughts of his audience first, he shows them that he can relate and then that makes them more susceptible to his purpose and message that he is about to explain. Another way that King evokes pathos in order to get his message across is in paragraph eleven on page two. Here, he shares with his audience what it feels like to be an African American during the 60's and have to constantly hear the word 'wait', always knowing that this wait usually means 'never'. He says, “I guess it is easy for those who have never felt the stinging darts of segregation to say 'wait'. But when you have seen vicious mobs lynch your mothers and fathers at will and drown your sisters and brothers at whim; when you have seen hate-filled policemen curse, kick, brutalize, and even…show more content…
Thoreau uses a basis of exemplification to organize his argument. Therefore, he provides a series of examples such as facts, specific cases, or instances, to turn a general idea into a specific one. Specifically for example, his particular use of multiple exemplifications of his topic. Whether that be his example on page 1, stating, “Trade and commerce, if they were not made of india-rubber, would never manage to bounce over the obstacles which legislators are continually putting in their way; and, if one were to judge these men wholly by the effects of their actions and not partly by their intentions, they would deserve to be classed and punished with those mischievous persons who put obstructions on the railroads.” (Thoreau 1). He then explains that he is not asking for no government at once, just a better one. He repeats
Open Document