Cis 500 Essay

972 Words4 Pages
Predictive Policing Tracy Hudson Dr. Edwin Otto CIS500-012VA016-1138-001 Info Syst Decision Making 20 October 2013 1. Compare and contrast the application of information technology (IT) to optimize police departments’ performance to reduce crime versus random patrols of the streets. A capable new technology with the intention of analyzing and predict crime tends before it occurs. Information Technology and Performance optimization of police department increase in crime rate, which is pervasive demands policing to be practical rather than reactive. It requires change from conventional too tough purposefully methods shared with better aptitude. This primarily led to the improvement of predictive policing in 1994 by NYPD. Conventional methods include casual patrolling which has limited ability to discover crime because patrolling entire location may not be feasible. This would involve additional police personnel and lot of time. Exact expectancy, timely targeted action and reduce resources for casual patrolling turns into achievable goals. NIJ defines Predictive Policing as “taking data from disparate sources, analyzing them and then using the results to anticipate, prevent and respond more effectively to future crime” This paved way for development of COMPSTAT (Computer Statistics) which used all crime related data as its input to anticipate a crime. (Willis, J., et al, 2004) 2. Describe how COMPSTAT, as an information system (IS), implements the four (4) basic IS functions: Input - Data gathering development which is the building block of COMPSTAT comprises of information compiled from an array of sources like police incidents, arrest reports, suspect debriefing, telephone calls, and field interview reports. Approaching the inputs to Incident Reporting System will help to retain a
Open Document