Terrorism- a nationalist response to the effects of globalization Globalization of economy politics and social issues has made people and groups more insecure and uncertain. One main consecuence of that insecurity is to look for a personal identity and to search for a cultural identity. Globalization is the phenomenon that explains growth to a global or world wide scale(wordnetweb.priceton.edu). Nationalism is the loyalty and devotion to a nation; especially: a sense of national conciousness (www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/nationalism). 1.
The Spanish-American War The Spanish-American War (1898) is viewed by many to have been the first indication of America’s imperial ambitions – however, historical conflict persists when viewing the nature of this imperialism. Some view it as a state-directed form of expansion; others as adhering to a sinister ‘military-industrial complex’; some consider it an explosion of jingoism. The investigation does not focus merely on whether American intervention in Cuba, and its concurrent declaration of War on Spain, was imperialistic; I also seek to examine how different schools of thought – Revisionist, Economic, Marxist and Cultural – characterise this imperialism and explain its contribution to war’s outbreak. The question developed from contemporary
His investigation was based on the pamphlet literature of the Revolution, which had as its sources the heritage of classical antiquity, Enlightenment rationalism, English common law, New England Puritanism, but most importantly the "radical social and political thought of the English Civil War and of the Commonwealth period. "26 Algernon Sidney, James Harrington, and Henry Neville were the seventeenth-century heroes of liberty that the colonist identified themselves with. John Trenchard and Thomas Gordon were the intellectual middlemen for the revolutionaries. From the Commonwealth political thought, the revolutionaries argued that the King's ministers were engaged in a conspiracy to restrict the liberty of the colonies. In their drive for power the ministers upset the balance of the British constitution.
Root Causes of the American Revolution There are many different reasons as to why the American Revolution took place. One might argue that the British oppression upon the colonists triggered the Revolution itself through unjust tax laws, land restrictions, trade regulations and political and economic differences. However, one might also argue that the differences between the upper and lower aroused conflict and social unrest, which called for revolution in order for a strong unification between the rich and the poor. Schweikart and Allen’s A Patriot’s History of the United States and Howard Zinn’s A People’s History of the United States discusses these two viewpoints as the root causes of the American Revolution. Although Zinn argues that the conflicts caused by the differentiating social classes in order to dissolve the class divisions was the main cause of the American Revolution, the “other side of the story” is told by Schweikart and Allen, as they reason that it was actually the British who unknowingly burdened the colonies with oppression, which brought about the revolution itself.
Orwell’s perspective as a reluctant and disgusted colonizer shapes his essay’s development, detail and main thesis. The essay’s first-person narrative, causal analysis and the detail it employs obviously produce a powerful condemnation of British colonialism. However, while Orwell briefly lists the obvious abuses of colonialism---the torture of prisoners, the appalling conditions in imperial jails, the destruction of the colonized’s spirit---he focuses his essay’s detail and development on colonialism’s effects on himself as colonizer, how this system causes his degradation and corruption as a human being. He presents his younger self as tormented by his role in this system, but also as someone who has absorbed its racist attitudes. He emphasizes his “intolerable sense of guilt” (313), but also his contradictory hatred of the Burmese, those “evil-spirited little beasts” (314), as well as his callous disregard for the native man killed by the elephant (319).
The war for independence was fought to end colonial rule. The war was based on politics and a separation of powers. In this essay I will start from the rising annoyance amongst the indigenous population and how the higher ranking classes exploited their failures for their own societal class gain in a system where they have always been favored more by societal leaders. Once New Spain established its new territory, inner cores were created as part of the system. New Spain would be under direction of the mother country Spain.
A range of language features and structures can be utilised for the purpose of challenging contextual values by speaking about the need for change. To do this skilful orators will use a wide range of the techniques of rhetoric to manipulate an audience into accepting their point of view. This is evident in the speech, “I Have a Dream” by Martin Luther King, as the empowering use of figurative language, structural techniques and vivid imagery emphasizes the distinction between the past and the present, and how injustice, such as the racist segregation of “Negros” from white society, was still present in the 1960’s. In relation to this concept, Indira Gandhi’s speech on “The True Liberation of Women” aggressively expresses her growing concern for the rights of women as it empowers individuals to stand up against social issues such as injustice and the myriad of stereotypes through the varied uses of rhetoric. This ability to use rhetoric for a specific purpose is also evident in the speech of Squealer in George Orwell’s satirical fable “Animal Farm”.
A form of civil disobedience that both individuals and a group of rogues practice, reading appears as a subversive act capable of undermining the social order. Thus, for those who fight the totalitarian government seek the healing of the nations and an end to oppression and mass ignorance. Rather than bear arms, they bear books. As a work much like Thoreau's "Civil Disobedience/' which calls for blatant challenging of the status quo, Fahrenheit 451 challenges the institutions that encompass our lives and demonstrates literature's ability to cultivate human autonomy. Criticism of Bradbury's works, specifically Fahrenheit 451 can easily be divided into two categories: criticism of the work as literature and criticism of the work as science fiction.
This slaves name is Harriet Jacob's. It is an autobiography called Incidents in the life of a Slave Girl. The excerpt was published after her escape to the north after hiding for seven years in an attic crawl space to prevent her masters advances. She said in her autobiography she said “my master is a crafty man, and resorted to many means to accomplish his purposes. Sometimes he had stormy, horrific ways that made his victims tremble; sometimes he assumed a gentleness that he thought must surely subdue.” when the slave wrote her autobiography, she was only fifteen years old.
“The United States have always protested against the doctrine of international law which permits the subjugation of the weak by the strong. A self-governing state cannot accept sovereignty over an unwilling people. The United States cannot act upon the ancient heresy that might makes right.” ( Halsall, 1997) They felt that the American Consitution and Declaration of Independence were being violated. The outcome of this policy took with it into the 20th century a more expanded foreign trade policy. American imperialism led to the overseas empire being both territorial and commercial.