Using a children's rights perspective, consider whether or not it should be made illegal for parents to smack their children
Corporal punishment has been a highly debated issue throughout legal history. There is no current legislation that makes parents smacking their children illegal
“Smacking” is a commonly accepted term for the (light) hitting of children in the name of discipline. Many parents smack their children with the belief that it will deter them from bad behaviour and that they themselves were smacked as children and are no worse for wear. Other parents view smacking as child abuse and refuse to engage in the practice. Today smacking remains a legal (in some cases) but highly controversial method of discipline.
Parents who smack children usually do so by swatting a child on the bottom. These parents believe that they are conditioning children to associate negative behaviours with negative consequences. This may be true, but opponents of smacking argue that this does not teach children anything – the key difference between simply punishing children and disciplining children in an instructive manner. These parents often recommend discipline techniques that require thought and reflection on inappropriate behaviour instead of smacking.
On the other side of the debate, supporters of the new law argued that the law
would help protect the rights of children and would result in a drop in cases of
physical abuse against children. Up until the law change, abusers of children
could escape prosecution by hiding behind a "reasonable force" clause in the
law. As it was, the law allowed for reasonable use of force to control children's
behavior. Now, for most people, reasonable force might be a smack on the
hand, but for other people, reasonable force might be a belt across the leg.
The problem with the law was that "reasonable force" is a subjective term and
open to interpretation
Suppose we accept that punishment is the best way to modify...