The reason the scene was cut from the play lies in both the significance of the conversation and what it revealed about the John Proctor in terms of his affair and his character. The conversation between John Proctor and Abigail Williams had great significance to both the play itself and the setting in which it was placed. It blatantly called out the irony of the Puritan way of life and the hypocrisy going on in Salem at the time. When Abigail addresses John and says, “Oh Hypocrites! Have you won him too?” [p. 151], she is referring to the townspeople of Salem as the hypocrites and questioning John’s integrity and strength.
This idea is explored in the novel, ‘Looking for Alibrandi’ by Melina Marchetta emphasizing on the negative side to one’s identity and its effects on life as they move into the world. Josephine in the novel is seen to be reflecting on her culture leading her to have a negative outlook on her future and the consequences she may undergo. This is evident when she states to the reader about her social status in comparison to others at her school leading her to have a downbeat response towards her future; ‘’ I come under the ‘scholarship’ category, and when I say that, I would rather be the daughter of a labourer, I felt disadvantaged from the beginning.’’ The use of the adjective ‘ scholarship’ in inverted commas emphasizes on Josephine’s differences compared to the ones who are wealthy leading her to be excluded as she experiences the downsides of being different from the others. This also emphasizes on Josephine’s negative outlook on life as she undergoes that experience. Moreover, as she reflects on her social status, she compares herself harshly to the ones who are not from ethnic backgrounds, wealthy and have the same level of smartness as her but still leave Josephine as an outcast having a downbeat impact on her life; The repetition of the 1st person reveals the confusion felt by Josephine with respect to her identity.
This would make some readers feel pity for Mayella as she is lamenting due to horrific flashbacks she may encounter, others may think that this is a cover up as she knows what she is doing is wrong, and she is trying to get the judge and the jury to side with her. This technique is used by Lee to make the ruler think and engage the readers. This view shared with Jem: “she’s got enough sense to get the judge sorry for her, but she might just be just – oh, I don’t know”. Here Harper Lee shows the mental controversy of the characters as that the trial has brought on
The Rose-Scented Edith Mikaila Smith In today's world, "image" seems to be the most important element that impacts our lives. Often, when we attempt to portray someone or something we are not, we are faced with misunderstanding and failure. In the short story, "Anointed With Oils", Alden Nowlan, introduced Edith, who was ashamed of her past. Trying to escape the disgrace of her family and her home, Edith moved to a boarding house, where she attempted to conform by dressing and acting like royalty. Despite her efforts to blend in, she went too far and other people saw her as being conceited.
Lennie does not know his own strength, reacts to trouble when he is scared Idioms- “old lady” (p.53), “throw a litter” (p.58), “punk” (p.62), “cut off his wind” (p.63) Allusions- Luger, phonograph, fence picket, Golden Gloves Chapter 4- 66. Crooks was alone, living by himself and able to leave his personal possessions lying around 67. Loneliness- people kept their distance from Crooks because he was black 68. Loneliness- Lennie also quite alone in the world- only friend is George and tries to make friends with Crooks 69. Lennie- a genuinely nice person, has nice smile that tempted Crooks to let him in 69.
That is why they could not find a motive. They just saw the small details in the kitchen as Mrs. Wright being a lazy house wife. They did not see that most women of there time was very neat and organized. The men were blind to all the women’s responsibilities and interests. The women looked at the small picture and found out the reason for her murdering Mr. Wright.
The Justice of Women “A Jury of Her Peers”, by Susan Glaspell, shows two women solving a murder because of their ability to pay attention to little details. Their husbands, who are important men in a small town, by ignoring women’s “trifles” – pans, dirty towels, sewing baskets – are not able to solve the case and even so the men mock the details observed by the women. While women talk about small details like dirty towels and sewing baskets, the men laugh at them and do not see the evidences. The female characters find the strangled bird, killed in the same way as the deceased (John Wright). The strangled bird symbolizes the miserable life of Mrs. Wright because she did not have kids, she possibly treated the bird as her child to sign
I don’t like it a bit. I wonder—I begin to think—I wish John would take me away from here.” The woman in the wallpaper reminds her of herself and the situation she is in. She feels like she cannot express herself and be the real her, because she is scared of what her husband my say or think. In “Metamorphosis” and “ The Yellow Wallpaper” both characters seem to face change. Gregor seems to face physical changes whereas the narrator in The Yellow Wallpaper seems to face mental changes.
The Awakening by Kate Chopin puts an interesting perspective on the oppression of women. Some of the reasons behind the book being unnecessary are that, going into the ocean shows a strange way of showing her freedom. Also the ending makes the reader think that woman cannot survive on their own without men, which would make the moral to this story kind of cloudy. Lastly, it also seems unneeded that the narrator would relate the bird with the broken wing falling into the ocean to Edna’s plunge into the ocean that killed her. The ending to a book like this one must have a powerful well rounded end that this book seems to lack.
John Steinbeck portrays Curley’s wife in two different ways. He creates sympathy and dislike for her, in many ways. For most of them there is a reason behind his ideas, howe b ver there are some key points where we are just supposed to accept what we’ve been told. Steinbeck starts off with a harsh and negative point of view, from the first characters we meet, Candy, the swamper; he is describing her to George and Lennie, our main protagonists. However Lennie also has an antagonistic side to his character, mainly because of his actions throughout the novel.