With a risk assessment this will show Mr Mistery the pros and the cons of living at home or with hes family. Without any influance towards any side. It will help him understand what life will be like living at either house, which will help him make a safe decision for himself. Civ. Mr Mistery may want to stay at home to keep hes independence, he may not want to be looked after by hes family.
As mentioned in the facts, the dog walker heard sounds of “two men fighting”. However, it was not until the police officers responded and got right up to the front door, that they heard the same “sounds of struggle”. In order to hear these sounds the dog walker clearly entered upon the defendants’ property, constituting an invasion of privacy. The officers responding also invaded the privacy of the defendants’ bedroom. Although the entrance to the house was legal, they were completely aware that there were persons in the residence.
The people inside the home very well could be just innocent people, living their day to day lives. Intruding in on people’s lives is so irresponsible, unfair, and does not comply with humane conduct while fighting battle. The prisoners’ wives most definitely thought they were going to be tortured or ever worse killed, which is just not fair. Walzer critiques the idea of the naked soldier by explaining that once the opposition is dressed for battle, why is it only then that they are now dangerous? In the sense of Walzer then, the Marines would not have been acting unjust, and that all the insurgents should be killed.
“Miser”, said the thief “he is alone. The miser does not have a slave.” Then the thieves were entering the study. The miser shouted and punched fiercely, but the thieves easily overpowered the old man. “Where is the, old man?” asked the thief. My faithful slave is guarding the money,” said the old man.
These ways of surveillance should never take place. In Oceania, the citizens have to be 100% obedient at all times or they will be arrested and tortured. Without your own privacy, people basically cannot live the life they want to live because the government is always watching them and making sure they do not do anything against its beliefs. If I were in the same position as Winston, I would also rebel against the Party and Big
This was one intention of our Forefathers when establishing the addendum of the Second Amendment. Allowing citizens the right to protect and defend their property and family from evading forces. At the time when the country was at war and constant violence this was the only way to ensure safety. The military needed to be where the fighting was, and this left the citizens at the mercy of the enemy. The Second Amendment gave the average citizen the right to protect his or her family and property without fear of imprisonment.
The debate will go on for however long the existence of guns are intact. The fact of the matter is that criminals do not and will never observe the laws. Regardless of the ceasing of guns or immensely regulated gun laws, there will always be a way to obtain one. So maybe owning a gun is good for the public so that one can defend oneself against criminals, or the absence of guns will reduce gun related crimes, nobody will ever know because things are changing constantly. Of course, society will never go back to swords but it’s one’s choice to keep a gun in the house that your family lives in.
The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. [1] With the second amendment allowing the common citizen the right to bear guns, one can legally apply and obtain a license to carry with them these weapons. Thus, the common people are armed awarding them with the ability of fighting chance against possible tyranny. Of Course, the idea of our American government committing such horrible, imposing, and unwanted acts on its people and the people actually forming a militia and treason to fight back sounds ridiculous in today’s reality; it does not mean it will never happened. After all, where would the United States be today without the original colonies arming themselves, forming militia, and performing a bit of treason.
Photograph all the evidence at the scene in the home and any injuries need to be documented evidence (Hess Orithmann, C., and Hess, K.M., 2013, p.305). 7. Collect and preserve evidence on the scene. Reconstruct the crime (Hess Orithmann, C., and Hess, K.M., 2013, p.305) Should the husband be arrested for this situation? Since the husband is there at the scene and has not defended his self from when she said he is the abuser.
Its our safety thats at stake. Ask yourselves, should the government keep making all the decisions, should they always act upon a situation where our lives are in danger. These are the same people that know nothing about the fear for ones safety. Their just inside their cousy houses, with bullet proof windows ,security cameras and 24 hour police