Case for Essayistic Analysis and Interpretation:

993 Words4 Pages
Facts 1. '' Company'' Ford is a producer of cars. 2. Pinto'' model'' which is designed to lift the company's shares on the market. 3. The fuel tank of the car was not sufficiently secured. 4. Detected is possible to remove a significant level of the defects, but with additional costs and loss of time. 5. It was released only two years after the initial project. 6. The resulting defect is not removed, and the company provides the necessary documents that the vehicle meets all federal safety standards. 7. Mrs. Lilly Gray bought a car Ford Pinto''''. 8. Mrs. Lilly Gray died after 6 months in a car accident after the car on fire as a result of a defect in the fuel tank, and her son was seriously burned. 9. As a result of such accidents killed at least 53 people Ethical issues Is it morally ethical'' Ford'' to market a car with proven defect in order to beat the competition "at all costs?" Is it morally ethical business decision not to complete costs (amounting to $ 137 million) for securing of the container.? Is it ethical adoption of cost - benefit analysis that shows that the costs are excessive and delayed serial production - uneconomical.? Victory over the competition "at all costs" does not mean sacrificing human life for this tsel.Ne Are namely people (customers, buyers of finished products) that contribute to this victory? Whether a victory painted red with the blood of people who died because of this purpose is more valuable and more satisfying than victory achieved by attracting more and more customers, satisfied customers coming because of a sense of security for their lives and that of their families.? Saving money for additional security of the tank you are - important than a human life? Does it have a price? Conflict of interest, in which prevails the desire for economic pechalba.Stremezhat for material progress prevails over the

More about Case for Essayistic Analysis and Interpretation:

Open Document