The University of California was in error of poor ethical codes. Bin Han would not have gone through all of this if the University had better control of business research. There were others that felt the repercussions of this case. A California State Legislator, Judy Chu, has said this case had the same type of allegations as a former one, Dr. Wen Ho Lee, a physicist, charged with stealing classified materials. Asian Americans are said to be marked by these types of actions.
While Richard Milhous Nixon is seen as the worst president in the history of the United States of America, many people and historians also believe he did “one thing right.” That “one thing”0 would be his trip to China or as Richard Nixon himself referred to it -“the week that changed the world”0 However did it really change the world? Or was it just a political move made by the Nixon administration in an election year? Though the visit to China did help in opening up trade and communication, it was useless for President Nixon to personally go to China, and was not a history changing event like it was portrayed. In the year of 1971 it was revealed that a top secret meeting was held in China between America’s top foreign relations officer -Henry
Explain your decision. * * If I had a great story that would increase my website’s popularity but compromise our national security, you bet your butt I wouldn’t publish it. I believe myself to be a patriot. If I were to give up information key to the safety of the people of the United States by jeopardizing our national security, not only would it be considered a felony and potentially put me in prison for the rest of my life, but I would feel guilty for betraying my country. Besides, if I was going to make a name for myself, it would be through hard honest work.
When utilizing the online services, the consumers want to be ensured that their personal information is secured, and to easily maneuver through the website. Problem Statement McBride Financial Services experiences multiple issues within the organization due to the lack of solid corporate governance policies, unethical attitudes and actions of Hugh McBride, CEO, and a lack of open communication. In an effort to correct the issue, this company will incorporate the ethical procedures defined by Beltway and will follow all governmental policies and financial reporting regulations while integrating state-of-the-art technology to ease consumer use. End-State Vision The mission statement is simple: “McBride Financial Services will be the preeminent provider of low cost mortgage services using state of the art technology in the five state area of Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, North Dakota, and South Dakota” (Apollo, 2003). McBride’s philosophy is to achieve excellent customer service by providing the “most efficient and effective processing of mortgage application from inception to closing” (Apollo, 2003), and the goals are to break even financially, gain profitability in one year, and to update the technology being used to “minimize costs and maximize efficiencies for customers and the business” (Apollo,
I wonder when we will say enough and demand that these institutions conduct their business with honesty, integrity and complete transparency.It’s no wonder that these countries hate the United States so passionately. John Perkins we could say is one of many few men that feel it is wrong to contribute “in creating world empire” at the expense of the less
Overall, I think filling the safety complaints was a great choice and that he did the right thing in doing that. The company violated OSHA and didn't take the complaints seriously. They also violated the employee by not acting on a serious issue. The courts verdict would reflect my job in this case because I would feel as If I didn't protect the employee and that I could of prevented the lawsuit. If I were a human resource manager, I would be ashamed and I would feel like I didn't do my job, and that I just ignored a safety issue that was serious.
It not only eerily resembles Orwell’s creation of “Big Brother”, but it also happens to be a massive waste of government resources and has shown very limited upside. For the good of the general public, the National Security Agency should not have access to domestic metadata on the grounds that it has acted unconstitutionally, unethically, and ineffectively. The NSA has secretly, yet deliberately, overstepped its constitutional boundaries. Under the Patriot Act and FISA warrants, the NSA has received judicial permission to pursue metadata avenues in hopes of foiling domestic terrorist attacks. Each time the agency desires to track an individual, it needs to file a request with FISA and a warrant can only be granted if there is reasonable suspicion.
But some also think that the threats are due to Americas weak cyber policy. Congressman Mike Rogers, Chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and a former FBI agent, has been warning that China has been stealing government information and intellectual property from U.S. businesses. If this is true,
Whether or not every decision is the absolute most efficient in hindsight is irrelevant. When we step back and look at the way the administration handled this, we are left with an unremarkable picture. The only remarkable thing about the situation is how long the unnecessary "controversy" has continued, and just how long our politicians are willing to draw it out for political gain. Though ultimately, it may have been lax security which enabled the attacks to take place AND some statements may have been made prematurely (in particular, Clinton's remark about the YouTube video) the administration's actions were in no way immoral or
According to Robert Solomon, “Good Ethics is Good Business” and “unethical conduct hurts business as a whole”. I agree with his point of view because in the business world, we have witnessed big companies fail and fall down due to their unethical practice. I also agree that being aware of the 3C’s, which are Compliance, Contributions, and Consequences, is the best tool to define Good Ethics in Business. Solomon used Break Breaker Inc. case to prove that unethical business strategy will lead to the quick failure of business. Break Breaker Inc. to some extent obey with some legal rules, but failed to comply with principles of morality and community, contribute to the society by producing honest high quality services, and account the consequence of damaging their reputation.