Case 1 Sigmund Frued

549 Words3 Pages
Case Study 1: Answer 1: Hank’s personality is a reflection of the unconscious mind as he is unaware of how others perceive him. Due to his behavior, he has been isolated from social circles and has never been able to get close to someone, be it a friend or a partner. Hence, there is no one who would help him introspect. As per Freud, Hank displays neurotic behavior, where instead of keeping things in his Id, his ego fails to stop the reactions and he says it out loud. Freud’s definition of fixation is persistence of anachronistic traits. It is a state where an individual becomes obsessed with a person or object. Hank always having something in his mouth to chew, his smoking habits, his sarcasm and nail biting are all manifestations of his fixation at the oral stage. His mom’s over-feeding him is a symbol of over protecting him and this has led to this regression in adulthood. Answer 2: Hank’s argumentative and eating behaviors are internally motivated. As a child he was exposed to immediate oral gratification by crying loudly. His mother immediately fed him again, even though he had been fed shortly before. Thus, this oral craving/fixation manifested into an obsession with oral stimulation, in adulthood. The nail biting, smoking, constant chewing was all symbolic of oral gratification. At the psychological level, this maladaptation has led to a sarcastic nature. Answer 3: Hank, as in the case of adults with maladaptive behavior due to oral fixation, was dependent on others to fulfill his needs. When due to his sarcastic remarks and behavior, people withdrew from fulfilling his needs he became defensive by rationalization. In the case of the client who complained of Hank being a “loud mouthed, belligerent cretin” due to Hank’s critical comments on his product, Hank does not realize that he misbehaved with the client, but in his
Open Document