The reduction in the network miles will improve fuel efficiency and reduce the carbon footprint. Packaging which should be part of the consolidation has an impact on wasted transportation capacity too. Using larger packages filled transportation equipment, warehouse space, and retailer selves more quickly than necessary. The net result will be a lot of “air” and wasted space. George and Jeff can reduce this waste by using smaller packages which will improve capacity utilization in transport equipment, warehouses, and retail stores.
This means as shift in the equilibrium point to a point that is further along the quantity axis and lower on the price axis meaning that the overall quantity of sales has risen but the price per good has fell. Also by introducing food subsidies it will cause a variety of positive externalities. These include a more productive work force as more workers will be a healthy diet allowing them to work harder and for longer without becoming tired and fatigued. This will also help to lower NHS costs as with a reduction in food prices some people will now be able to afford better quality foods and move away from high fat foods such as ready-made meals.
The deforestation of the rainforest only directly affects a small margin of people whereas the production of 99p cheeseburgers across the world provides pleasure for inconceivably large amount of people. The burgers are delicious and Mcdonalds is doing well so they’ll be around for quite a while, this means that the pleasure caused by the deforestation of the rainforest to create farmland is ethically good. This is a particularly fool proof theory, if it’s good for a lot of people don’t worry about the consequences. However the process of achieving the telos for the people could result
But is this true? As we can truly say, nutritionism is not actually benefiting society in general because it lacks real food, it’s more expensive, and causes many diseases; however, nutritionism can be very successful for the world of business of industries. When we talk about real food, it means recognizable, good quality, whole food that rots when it's kept for too long. These foods are the ones our ancestors used to eat on a regular basis until it was replaced with a whole new type of nutrition one, in which chemically-infused, food- like materials focused mainly on nutritional facts. For example, when we go in the supermarket to buy food we read the facts in the back of the product checking what types nutrition it has, and how much it has.
Conventionally raised cattle have long been fed fats and proteins along with grass and grains; it helps them gain weight more quickly. Unfortunately, much of the fat and protein they’ve been fed in more recent times comes from other animals. This to me is a huge ethical issue; we have gone from letting our cattle naturally eat grass, which they have always done, to changing their diets to something completely different. The FDA still permits cattle to eat feed containing byproducts of pigs, fish, chicken, and horses, among other animals, to promote weight gain. This weight gain is not necessary, it is just desired because cattle can be slaughtered at a younger age and more meat can be produced.
You still got all the nutrients and vitamins from foods that are not local. Plus they still taste good. If our community were to start a locavore movement it would affect everyone because we would have to make more space for crops and farmers. Also farmers from around the world would also have fewer costumers. As Source C shows, it actually takes just as much fuel—and thus, just as much pollution—to ship a small load from a local farm as to ship a large load from a farther location.
Why was our country so docile and accepting of such horrible food choices that were causing obesity, health issues, and in many ways contributing to the skyrocketing health care costs? I do not buy these unhealthy processed corn and soybean products and instead buy organic, whole foods. But it is expensive to make these choices, so some of this anger got projected towards Monsanto. But a good dose of it goes to the social injustice aspect of this issue: everyone should be able to afford healthy foods that do not harm your
Next, the feeling that you are getting more for less in a timely manner, quantification and calculation, are other elements of the system. By offering a “value meal”, McDonald’s seemed to be giving us more “bang for the buck”, as Ritzer puts it. He claims that as a society, we feel that “bigger is better” so getting hamburger, fries and a soda for a modest price in less time than it would take us to cook our own mean is very attractive. If we as a society can get all of this in a quantified and calculated manner so that we have time to do other things, the idea becomes even more attractive because of society’s feeling that time is money. Another element of the McDonald’s System is predictability.
Mass production may not be perfect, but it is not bad. Mass production can be used to achieve a healthier nation by not injecting animals with growth hormones. Fast food is also very unhealthy and cause many diseases. Fast food contains more calories. Not only does past contain more calories but it also contains more unhealthy fat.
This contributes to solving the problem of world hunger as droughts, pests and diseases are the biggest contribution to wastage of food. With less food wastage it contributes to lessened percentage of world hunger as there is more produce available to be sold. Less produce in demand means less increasing food prices which makes it possible for people in third world countries that suffer the most from world hunger to be able to get by, get food and not have to worry about food going to waste in short amount of time. (Lallanilla, 2016) Technically GM foods is a solution to world hunger as it also cause an increase in the yield of crops thus making more produce available and more effective use of land where less use of pesticides have been noted. (Diehl, 2016).