Business Environmental Factors in Global Economy

602 Words3 Pages
Introduction to Business Week 1 Assignment 3 Siri Bilvin 03/25/14 BUS1101 S05 Professor: Michael Blagg South University When a rule is altered, it can be hard to establish exactly which alterations in the economy were directly generated to the rule being altered, and which were generated by unconnected components. “The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), executed on Jan. 1, 1994, is no exception” (Fontinelle, 2012). Here are a few of the pros and cons that have been accredited to the agreement (Fontinelle, 2012). Some of the pros of the NAFTA are: lower tariffs. “A tariff is a tax that a national government places on an imported or exported good or service to encourage or discourage trade” (Fontinelle, 2012). These taxes raise the prices for customers, which in succession disheartens the utilizationtion of those goods and services. The single most prevalent explanation for the government to force tariffs is to shield U.S. businesses from inexpensive overseas adversaries. The lower trade limitations brought about by NAFTA has made it simpler for the United States to buy Canadian and Mexican products. As of 2010, the U. S. has obtained about one forth of its impoted products from Canada and Mexico, which are its second and third largest suppliers of imported goods. “In particular, the United States obtains most of its crude oil, vehicles, machinery and gold from these two countries, as well as fresh produce, snack foods, live animals, red meat and chilled and frozen foods” (Fontinelle, 2012). “All of these countries gained real wage raises. The NAFTA raised wages in the U.S. by 0.17%, in Canada by 0.96% and in Mexico by 1.3%” (Fontinelle, 2012). NAFTA is accredited with notably raising trade between the U.S., Mexico and Canada. The United States by itself traded $1.6 trillion in products and hired help with its NAFTA associates in 2009,
Open Document