The tax on the year 1 deprecation would then be $28,050 * .40, which equals $11,220. After adding $11,020 to the $15,000 in savings, the cash flow for year 1 would equal $26,220. For year 2, the depreciation expense would equal $85,000 * .45, or $38,250. The tax on the year 2 deprecation would then be $38,250 * .40, which equals $15,300. After adding $15,300 to the $15,000 in savings, the cash flow for year 2 would equal $30,300.
Margin of Safety (DOLLARS) Budgeted – break even = 100,000-62500= 37500 (Percentage) 37.500/100.000= 37.5% (Units) 37500/250= 150 3.Compute the company’s margin of safety in units assuming the proposal is accepted. Margin of Safety (Dollars) 137500-58929= 78571 (Units) 78571/275= 286 4. Compute the increase or decrease in profit assuming the proposal is accepted, show the contribution Income Statement for current and proposed. Present Proposed Sales 100,000 137500 Variable expense 64000 80000 CM 36000 57500 Fixed cost 22500 244750 Net income 13500 32750 difference: 19250 4a. What is the operating leverage for the current and proposed?
* Of the $18400 Rhodes made in mortgage payments last year, $8000 was interest. The income statement lists 2008 interest paid as $32000, which means that there are other debts that required payments of $24000. If possible, accelerating payback on these loans can be very beneficial in the long run. * At industry average levels, wages of a similar business would be approximately $79000, or $11000 lower. * Wages, advertising and rent total %23.1 of sales in the average business, leaving %1.9 of sales for property taxes, interest, utilities, depreciation and other expenses.
Muscarella Inc. has the following balance sheet and income statement data: Cash $ 14,000 Accounts payable $ 42,000 Receivables 70,000 Other current liabilities 28,000 Inventories 210,000 Total CL $ 70,000 Total CA $294,000 Long-term debt 70,000 Net fixed assets 126,000 Common equity $280,000 Total Assets $420,000 Total liab. and equity $420,000 Sales $280,000 Net income $ 21,000 The new CFO thinks that inventories are excessive and could be lowered sufficiently to cause the current
Current Ratio 2011 = Current Assets / Current liabilities Gaps Current Ratio = 4,309 / 2,128 = 2.0249 This means that The Gap Inc. is capable of paying its short-term liabilities two times by selling its current assets. What was the current ratio for 2010? How did the current ratio change? Current Ratio 2010 = 3,926 / 2,095 = 1.8739 The current Ratio for The Gap Inc. Increase from 1.8739 to 2.0249 What is the implication of that change? The current ratio increased because there was a considerable increase in Cash and other current assets.
If the sales outlook for the coming three years was only 20,000,000 and B.E. continued producing at the rate of 30,000,000 units, a total of 10,000,000 units would be dumped into ending inventory at the end of each year once again reducing costs of goods sold and falsely increasing income. By the end of year 2013, B.E. Company would have 35,000,000 units sitting in ending inventory taking up space and costing money to store. Once again if the president’s bonus is based off of net income, this situation is the most favorable for a high paying bonus and encourages stockpiling inventory to inflate net income.
• NPAT* excluding sass & bide put option revaluation $129 million, down 5.1% • Strong cash flow supports final dividend of 8 cps, full year dividend 18 cps, fully franked “Continued execution of five-point plan” * Excludes sass & bide put option revaluation: FY2012 ($3.0 million gain) and FY2013 ($2.2 million expense) Image: TBC (TBC) Image: Orla Kiely DELIVERING OUR PLAN / 3 Full year highlights • Sales and gross profit growth in key categories • Myer Exclusive Brands now 20.0% of sales mix • sass & bide double-digit sales and profit growth • Increased recognition of our customer service journey • Ongoing investment: new stores, refurbishments, brands, online • MYER one strengthened with Platinum tier, app launched • Online sales, page views and average monthly visits doubled • Net debt down 11.2%, lending facilities refinanced Image: sass & bide OVERVIEW / 4 12 September 2013 2 MYER Full Year Results 2013 • • • • • Overview Financial update Delivering our five-point plan Investing for the future Outlook Image: Wayne by Wayne Cooper (Myer Exclusive Brand) Financial
The real wage and rental price of capital also increase by 10 percent. Question 4 (15 marks) a) Public saving equals T-G. An increase in government spending, G, reduces public saving. b) Private saving equals Y-T-C. An increase in government spending does not affect private saving. c) National saving equals Y-C-G. An increase in government spending reduces national saving by an amount equal to the increase in government spending. d) The equilibrium interest rate increases to bring desired investment into equilibrium with the reduced quantity of national saving.
To obtain a profit of $1,000,000, the total contribution margin should be $1,000,000 greater than the fixed costs ($10,000,000), for a value of $11,000,000. This amount must also equal the contribution margin multiplied volume, $800 x Volume = $11,000,000. The volume = $11,000,000/$800 = 13,750 visits Similarly, to obtain a profit of $500,000, the total contribution margin should be $500,000 greater than the fixed costs ($10,000,000), for a value of $10,500,000. This amount must also equal the contribution margin multiplied volume, $800 x Volume = $10,500,000. The volume = $10,500,000/$800 = 13,125 visits d. Now
1. Given the following information: Total assets $250,000 Debt (12% interest rate) $150,000 Equity $40,000 Variable costs of production $150 per unit Fixed cost of production $50,000 Units Sold 1,000 Sales price $210 per unit What happens to operating income and net income if output is increased by 10 percent? Verify your answer. Solution: The operating income: Revenues: $210 x (1,000) = $210,000 Expenses: $150 x (1,000) + $50,000 = $200,000 Operating income: $210,000 - 200,000 = $10,000 Net income: $10,000 - (.12 x 150,000) = ($8,000) With 10% increase in revenue: Revenues: $210 x (1,100) = 231,000 Expenses: $150 x (1,100) + $50,000 = $215,000 Operating income: $231,000 - $215,000 = $16,000 Net income $16,000 - (.12 x $150,000) = ($2,000) Operating income rose from $10,000 to $16,000 for a 60% increase. Net income rose from ($8,000) to ($2,000) which cut losses by $6,000.