Bp and Its Corporate Social Responsibilities

2637 Words11 Pages
Do you think BP acted ethically in its dealings with the public? Can you apply anything that you learned in this class to BP actions during the cleanup? BP acted ethically to a degree by paying compensatory damages to fishermen, property owners and others in the Gulf area affected by the spill. They however tried to play the role of someone remediating a problem they themselves had caused. These actions were required by the U.S. government and the coast guard to protect it citizens. If BP did not do those things, they would have been subject to additional penalties. Was that primarily a problem of communication - actually having to explain to people what BP was doing - or did BP's split role create operational obstacles? I don't think it was a big deal operationally because I had the legal authority to direct BP to take any appropriate action, and if they didn't, they were subject to penalties. That was a pretty big stick to hold over them. It was a continual challenge to explain to the American public and local leaders what was going on. They were accustomed to a disaster-response system where locals were in charge, and if the feds get involved they are giving support. This action had a very different legal framework that assumed federal preemption for the response to the spill. The causes of the disastrous blowout and gas explosion on BP's leased Deepwater Horizon offshore drilling rig in the Gulf of Mexico are a long way from being determined. Yet already BP's actions are facing unprecedented scrutiny, thanks to a years-long history of legal and ethical violations that critics, judges and members of Congress say shows that the London-based company has a penchant for putting profits ahead of just about everything else. Over the past two decades, BP subsidiaries have been convicted three times of environmental crimes in Alaska and Texas, including two
Open Document