ZINN CHAPTER 4 1. What is the thesis of this chapter? Around 1776, certain important people in the English colonies made a discovery that would prove enormously useful for the next two hundred years. They found that by creating a nation, a symbol, a legal unity called the United States, they could take over land, profits, and political power from favorites of the British Empire. In the process, they could hold back a number of potential rebellions and create a consensus of popular support for the rule of a new, privileged leadership.When we look at the American Revolution this way, it was a work of genius, and the Founding Fathers deserve the awed tribute they have received over the centuries.
You’d be scared that there is an attack coming your way. 2. How did the naval arms race encourage the development of the alliance system the way it did? Be sure to refer to Great Britain, France, Germany, and Russia, as well as each of the alliance groups specifically. The navel arms raced encouraged the Development of the Alliance system, Because the joining of The different countries meant even more power to both Germany and Great Britain.
The political scene in the USSR also changed for the better during the war—while initially the military reported directly to the Kremlin, Stalin soon appointed an able-bodied leader to the military, Marshal Zhukov, and this allowed the military greater flexibility and, in turn, greater success in battle. The production power of the United States, which made up for slow troop turnouts, was a driving factor in the success of the Allies. FDR’s New Deal policies were partly to
Common Sense. It is such a great name for the book written by Thomas Paine. Anyone who has common sense would agree with what he wrote. He was a very smart man and good with words. His book is based on how America should branch away from Britain and become more independent.
Riasanovsky, Freeze and Service were very influential. All were particularly good as they included new research post 1991 which has extended our knowledge particularly in the areas of economic and social development. Riasanovsky’s book is particularly good in these two areas and makes interesting contrasts with Tsarist times. Freeze is better on the political aspects drawing out the influence of ideology in the Soviet period. It offers a balanced historical account recognising that not only are there different interpretations but also further may provide new insights.
Montaigne: An Expert in Argument Montaigne’s “Of Cannibals” uses a myriad of thoughts and facts to teach the audience a moral lesson and pass along the narrator’s perception of the current Western Worlds trends. Montaigne writes his essay in such a way that the context is still relevant in society hundreds of years later. The allegory and use of prominent Western writers of literature provided the basis of his argument, that love and valor, are in simplest forms, the common denominator amongst all people, which would create a good society. Montaigne succeeds in gaining the attention of the reader by using many different manipulative techniques. Whether the reader finished the essay and finds themselves aligned with his position is one thing; the fact that Montaigne is able to create a forum for discussion and debate following his essay, even hundreds of years later, is a fact and certainly worth discussing, as his modes for delivering his position are genius.
A standard way that the Emperors used their power was for military purposes. Because Rome was a large and thriving empire; a strong army was needed for equally attacking and defending against opposition. Emperors could effortlessly find new recruits for enlistment to the Roman legions. This would provide the advantage of larger numbers of soldiers in a battle. This benefit allowed tactics such as the ‘wedge’ to be executed as more soldiers could reinforce the wedge from behind, which would consequently break the enemies’ formation (Roman Empire.net 2012).
The Inevitability of Negative Consequences of the Industrial Revolution The perception of the industrial revolution as a key factor in changing the way of life is a fair statement. It is termed a “revolution” because the changes it produced were great and sudden. This revolution first appeared in Britain in the 1700s, fostering attitudes toward capitalism and modern industry everywhere. New traditions replaced old traditions, machinery replaced people, and people moved to urban cities from rural areas; simply, the way of life had been changed forever. The industrial revolution introduced mass production and greater markets.
Although there are many key elements of the rapid industrialization during the 19th century that aided in producing the outcomes (Urbanization, Social Classes/Living Conditions, Inventions), the most significant features that gave life to industrial and social progression were the introduction of mechanization, and the improvements made to transportation during the era of the Industrial Revolution. Mechanization: The first and one of the most important positive aspects of the Industrial Revolution was the mechanization of most labor methods, which allowed for a higher rate of production for and contributed greatly to the economic expansion and development of Western societies. The first example of mechanical introduction during the early years of the Industrial Revolution was that of the cotton textile industry. Prior to the inventions of Elias Howe (sewing machine) and
Also writers, artists and musicians were made to produce works or realism glorifying soviet achievements. This appealed to patriotism and made the legacy of the Stalinist system strong[2]. Also the fact that Stalin succeeded in galvanising the nation meant the Stalinist system was well suited to the demands of total war as it was already centrally planned[3]. This advantage led to Stalin being a successful leader of the USSR in those years. Stalin’s economic strategies led to the successful growth of industrialism and modernisation of the USSR.